Literature DB >> 17889272

Intra- and interfractional variations for prone breast irradiation: an indication for image-guided radiotherapy.

Natalya V Morrow1, Christopher Stepaniak, Julia White, J Frank Wilson, X Allen Li.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Intra- and interfractional errors for breast cancer patients undergoing breast irradiation in the prone position were analyzed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To assess intrafractional error resulting from respiratory motion, four-dimensional computed tomography scans were acquired for 3 prone and 3 supine patients, and the respiratory motion was compared for the two positions. To assess the interfractional error caused by daily set-up variations, daily electronic portal images of one of the treatment beams were taken for 15 prone-positioned patients. Portal images were then overlaid with images from the planning system that included the breast contour and the isocenter, treatment beam portal, and isocenter. The shift between the planned and actual isocenter was recorded for each portal image, and descriptive statistics were collected for each patient. The margins were calculated using the 2Sigma + 0.7sigma recipe, as well as 95% confidence interval based on the pooled standard deviation of the datasets.
RESULTS: Respiratory motion of the chest wall is drastically reduced from 2.3 +/- 0.9 mm in supine position to -0.1 +/- 0.4 mm in prone position. The daily set-up errors vary in magnitude from 0.0 cm to 1.65 cm and are patient dependent. The margins were defined by considering only the standard deviation to be 1.1 cm, and 2.0 cm when the systematic errors were considered using the 2Sigma + 0.7sigma recipe.
CONCLUSIONS: Prone positioning of patients for breast irradiation significantly reduces the uncertainty introduced by intrafractional respiratory motion. The presence of large systematic error in the interfractional variations necessitates a large clinical target volume-to-planning target volume margin and indicates the importance of image guidance for partial breast irradiation in the prone position, particularly using imaging modality capable of identifying the lumpectomy cavity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17889272     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.06.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  15 in total

1.  Respiratory Motion, Anterior Heart Displacement and Heart Dosimetry: Comparison Between Prone (Pr) and Supine (Su) Whole Breast Irradiation.

Authors:  Ferenc Lakosi; Akos Gulyban; Levente Janvary; Selma Ben-Mustapha Simoni; Nicolas Jansen; Laurence Seidel; Arpad Kovacs; Peter Vavassis; Philippe Coucke
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Setup accuracy for prone and supine whole breast irradiation.

Authors:  Thomas Mulliez; Akos Gulyban; Tom Vercauteren; Annick van Greveling; Bruno Speleers; Wilfried De Neve; Liv Veldeman
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Prone whole-breast irradiation using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in women undergoing breast conservation for early disease yields high rates of excellent to good cosmetic outcomes in patients with large and/or pendulous breasts.

Authors:  Carmen Bergom; Tracy Kelly; Natalya Morrow; J Frank Wilson; Alonzo Walker; Qun Xiang; Kwang Woo Ahn; Julia White
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Dose-volume parameters predict for the development of chest wall pain after stereotactic body radiation for lung cancer.

Authors:  Robert W Mutter; Fan Liu; Andres Abreu; Ellen Yorke; Andrew Jackson; Kenneth E Rosenzweig
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Variability of target and normal structure delineation for breast cancer radiotherapy: an RTOG Multi-Institutional and Multiobserver Study.

Authors:  X Allen Li; An Tai; Douglas W Arthur; Thomas A Buchholz; Shannon Macdonald; Lawrence B Marks; Jean M Moran; Lori J Pierce; Rachel Rabinovitch; Alphonse Taghian; Frank Vicini; Wendy Woodward; Julia R White
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  The role of a prone setup in breast radiation therapy.

Authors:  Nelly Huppert; Gabor Jozsef; Keith Dewyngaert; Silvia Chiara Formenti
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Korean First Prospective Phase II Study, Feasibility of Prone Position in Postoperative Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Dosimetric Comparison.

Authors:  Yoonsun Chung; Jeong Il Yu; Won Park; Doo Ho Choi
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 4.679

8.  Different intensity extension methods and their impact on entrance dose in breast radiotherapy: A study.

Authors:  A Sankar; J Velmurugan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2009-10

9.  Accuracy and efficiency of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for preoperative partial breast radiosurgery.

Authors:  Sua Yoo; Jennifer O'Daniel; Rachel Blitzblau; Fang-Fang Yin; Janet K Horton
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2020

10.  Prone versus supine position for adjuvant breast radiotherapy: a prospective study in patients with pendulous breasts.

Authors:  Marco Krengli; Laura Masini; Tina Caltavuturo; Carla Pisani; Giuseppina Apicella; Eleonora Negri; Letizia Deantonio; Marco Brambilla; Giuseppina Gambaro
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.