Literature DB >> 17888553

Informed consent, anticipatory regulation and ethnographic practice.

Elizabeth Murphy1, Robert Dingwall.   

Abstract

In this paper we examine the application of informed consent to ethnographic research in health care settings. We do not quarrel with either the principle of informed consent or its translation into the requirement that research should only be carried out with consenting participants. However, we do challenge the identification of informed consent with the particular set of bureaucratic practices of ethical review which currently operate in Canada, the US and elsewhere. We argue that these anticipatory regulatory regimes threaten the significant contribution of ethnographic research to the creation of more efficient, more effective, more equitable and more humane health care systems. Informed consent in ethnographic research is neither achievable nor demonstrable in the terms set by anticipatory regulatory regimes that take clinical research or biomedical experimentation as their paradigm cases. This is because of differences in the practices of ethnographic and biomedical research which we discuss. These include the extended periods of time ethnographers spend in the research setting, the emergent nature of ethnographic research focus and design, the nature and positioning of risk in ethnographic research, the power relationships between researchers and participants, and the public and semi-public nature of the settings normally studied. Anticipatory regulatory regimes are inimical to ethnographic research and risk undermining the contribution of systematic inquiry to understanding whether institutions do what they claim to do, fairly and civilly and with an appropriate mobilisation of resources. We do not suggest that we should simply ignore ethics or leave matters to the individual consciences of researchers. Rather, we need to develop and strengthen professional models of regulation which emphasise education, training and mutual accountability. We conclude the paper with a number of suggestions about how such professional models might be implemented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17888553     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  11 in total

1.  Procedure versus process: ethical paradigms and the conduct of qualitative research.

Authors:  Kristian Pollock
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 2.  Quality assurance of qualitative research: a review of the discourse.

Authors:  Joanna Reynolds; James Kizito; Nkoli Ezumah; Peter Mangesho; Elizabeth Allen; Clare Chandler
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2011-12-19

3.  "Dying a hero": parents' and young people's discourses on concurrent sexual partnerships in rural Tanzania.

Authors:  Joyce Wamoyi; Daniel Wight
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Ethical dilemmas and reflexivity in qualitative research.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Reid; Jeremy M Brown; Julie M Smith; Alexandra C Cope; Susan Jamieson
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2018-04

5.  Palliative care in its own discourse: a focused ethnography of professional messaging in palliative care.

Authors:  Carla Reigada; Maria Arantzamendi; Carlos Centeno
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.234

6.  Making infection prevention and control everyone's business? Hospital staff views on patient involvement.

Authors:  Elizabeth Sutton; Liz Brewster; Carolyn Tarrant
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-02-17       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Participant compensation in global health research: a case study.

Authors:  Sepeedeh Saleh; Henry Sambakunsi; Deborah Nyirenda; Moses Kumwenda; Kevin Mortimer; Martha Chinouya
Journal:  Int Health       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.473

8.  'Where have all the doctors gone?' A protocol for an ethnographic study of the retention problem in emergency medicine in the UK.

Authors:  Daniel Darbyshire; Liz Brewster; Rachel Isba; Richard Body; Dawn Goodwin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  'Mum never loved me.' How structural factors influence adolescent sexual and reproductive health through parent-child connectedness: a qualitative study in rural Tanzania.

Authors:  Joyce Wamoyi; Daniel Wight
Journal:  Afr J AIDS Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.300

10.  Ethnographic methods for process evaluations of complex health behaviour interventions.

Authors:  Sarah Morgan-Trimmer; Fiona Wood
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.