Literature DB >> 17887906

Finite element and experimental cortex strains of the intact and implanted tibia.

A Completo1, F Fonseca, J A Simões.   

Abstract

Finite Element (FE) models for the simulation of intact and implanted bone find their main purpose in accurately reproducing the associated mechanical behavior. FE models can be used for preclinical testing of joint replacement implants, where some biomechanical aspects are difficult, if not possible, to simulate and investigate in vitro. To predict mechanical failure or damage, the models should accurately predict stresses and strains. Commercially available synthetic femur models have been extensively used to validate finite element models, but despite the vast literature available on the characteristics of synthetic tibia, numerical and experimental validation of the intact and implant assemblies of tibia are very limited or lacking. In the current study, four FE models of synthetic tibia, intact and reconstructed, were compared against experimental bone strain data, and an overall agreement within 10% between experimental and FE strains was obtained. Finite element and experimental (strain gauge) models of intact and implanted synthetic tibia were validated based on the comparison of cortex bone strains. The study also includes the analysis carried out on standard tibial components with cemented and noncemented stems of the P.F.C Sigma Modular Knee System. The overall agreement within 10% previously established was achieved, indicating that FE models could be successfully validated. The obtained results include a statistical analysis where the root-mean-square-error values were always <10%. FE models can successfully reproduce bone strains under most relevant acting loads upon the condylar surface of the tibia. Moreover, FE models, once properly validated, can be used for preclinical testing of tibial knee replacement, including misalignment of the implants in the proximal tibia after surgery, simulation of long-term failure according to the damage accumulation failure scenario, and other related biomechanical aspects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17887906     DOI: 10.1115/1.2768382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  8 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of the tibial tray design in TKA: comparison between modular and offset tibial trays.

Authors:  Ângela Chan; João Gamelas; João Folgado; Paulo R Fernandes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Finite element assessment of metaphyseal sleeves in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  B Frehill; A D Crocombe
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-18

Review 3.  Measurement of Bone: Diagnosis of SCI-Induced Osteoporosis and Fracture Risk Prediction.

Authors:  Karen L Troy; Leslie R Morse
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2015-11-16

4.  Does Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Affect Tibial Bone Strain? A Paired Cadaveric Comparison of Fixed- and Mobile-bearing Designs.

Authors:  Geert Peersman; Orcun Taylan; Joshua Slane; Ben Vanthienen; Jeroen Verhaegen; Lyne Anthonissen; G Harry van Lenthe; Thomas Heyse; Lennart Scheys
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty: The role of stems.

Authors:  Shuqiao Xie; Noel Conlisk; David Hamilton; Chloe Scott; Richard Burnett; Pankaj Pankaj
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 5.853

6.  Reduced tibial strain-shielding with extraosseous total knee arthroplasty revision system.

Authors:  Tomas A Correa; Bidyut Pal; Richard J van Arkel; Felice Vanacore; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Biomechanical evaluation of tibial bone adaptation after revision total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of different implant systems.

Authors:  María Paz Quilez; Belen Seral; María Angeles Pérez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Finite Element Assessment of the Screw and Cement Technique in Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chong Zheng; Hai-Yang Ma; Yin-Qiao Du; Jing-Yang Sun; Ji-Wei Luo; Dong-Bin Qu; Yong-Gang Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.