BACKGROUND: By the age of 20 years, almost all patients with Duchenne's or Becker's muscular dystrophy have experienced dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), a condition that contributes significantly to their morbidity and mortality. Although studies have shown carvedilol to be an effective therapy for patients with other forms of DCM, few data exist concerning its safety and efficacy for patients with muscular dystrophy. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of carvedilol for patients with DCM. METHODS: A clinical trial at an outpatient clinic investigated 22 muscular dystrophy patients, ages 14 to 46 years, with DCM and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 50%. Carvedilol up-titrated over 8 weeks then was administered at the maximum or highest tolerated dose for 6 months. Baseline and posttreatment cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), echocardiography, and Holter monitoring were recorded. RESULTS:Carvedilol therapy was associated with a modest but statistically significant improvement in CMR-derived ejection fraction (41% +/- 8.3% to 43% +/- 8%; p < 0.02). Carvedilol also was associated with significant improvements in both the mean rate of pressure rise (dP/dt) during isovolumetric contraction (804 +/- 216 to 951 +/- 282 mmHg/s; p < 0.05) and the myocardial performance index (0.55 +/- 0.18 to 0.42 +/- 0.15; p < 0.01). A trend toward improved shortening fraction, E/E' ratio, and isovolumetric relaxation time also was observed. Two patients had runs of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia exceeding 140 beats per minute (bpm) before carvedilol administration. Ventricular tachycardia exceeding 140 bpm was not observed after carvedilol therapy. Carvedilol was well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were identified. CONCLUSIONS:Carvedilol therapy appears to be safe for patients with DCM secondary to muscular dystrophy and produces a modest improvement in systolic and diastolic function.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: By the age of 20 years, almost all patients with Duchenne's or Becker's muscular dystrophy have experienced dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), a condition that contributes significantly to their morbidity and mortality. Although studies have shown carvedilol to be an effective therapy for patients with other forms of DCM, few data exist concerning its safety and efficacy for patients with muscular dystrophy. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of carvedilol for patients with DCM. METHODS: A clinical trial at an outpatient clinic investigated 22 muscular dystrophypatients, ages 14 to 46 years, with DCM and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 50%. Carvedilol up-titrated over 8 weeks then was administered at the maximum or highest tolerated dose for 6 months. Baseline and posttreatment cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), echocardiography, and Holter monitoring were recorded. RESULTS:Carvedilol therapy was associated with a modest but statistically significant improvement in CMR-derived ejection fraction (41% +/- 8.3% to 43% +/- 8%; p < 0.02). Carvedilol also was associated with significant improvements in both the mean rate of pressure rise (dP/dt) during isovolumetric contraction (804 +/- 216 to 951 +/- 282 mmHg/s; p < 0.05) and the myocardial performance index (0.55 +/- 0.18 to 0.42 +/- 0.15; p < 0.01). A trend toward improved shortening fraction, E/E' ratio, and isovolumetric relaxation time also was observed. Two patients had runs of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia exceeding 140 beats per minute (bpm) before carvedilol administration. Ventricular tachycardia exceeding 140 bpm was not observed after carvedilol therapy. Carvedilol was well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were identified. CONCLUSIONS:Carvedilol therapy appears to be safe for patients with DCM secondary to muscular dystrophy and produces a modest improvement in systolic and diastolic function.
Authors: S R Ommen; R A Nishimura; C P Appleton; F A Miller; J K Oh; M M Redfield; A J Tajik Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-10-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: L A Bruns; M K Chrisant; J M Lamour; R E Shaddy; E Pahl; E D Blume; S Hallowell; L J Addonizio; C E Canter Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Fragiskos I Parthenakis; Marina K Kanakaraki; Emmanuel M Kanoupakis; Emmanuel I Skalidis; George F Diakakis; Olvia K Filippou; Panos E Vardas Journal: Chest Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Christopher Spurney; Reiko Shimizu; Lauren P Morgenroth; Hanna Kolski; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Paula R Clemens Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2014-05-14 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: Christopher F Spurney; Francis M McCaffrey; Avital Cnaan; Lauren P Morgenroth; Sunil J Ghelani; Heather Gordish-Dressman; Adrienne Arrieta; Anne M Connolly; Timothy E Lotze; Craig M McDonald; Robert T Leshner; Paula R Clemens Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Subha V Raman; Kan N Hor; Wojciech Mazur; Nancy J Halnon; John T Kissel; Xin He; Tam Tran; Suzanne Smart; Beth McCarthy; Michael D Taylor; John L Jefferies; Jill A Rafael-Fortney; Jeovanna Lowe; Sharon L Roble; Linda H Cripe Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2014-12-30 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Ju Lan Chun; Robert O'Brien; Min Ho Song; Blake F Wondrasch; Suzanne E Berry Journal: Stem Cells Transl Med Date: 2012-12-27 Impact factor: 6.940