BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Accurate detection and classification of purely intracortical lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS) are important in understanding their role in disease progression and impact on the clinical manifestations of the disease. However, detection of these lesions with conventional MR imaging remains a challenge. Although double inversion recovery (DIR) has been shown to improve the sensitivity of the detection of cortical lesions, this sequence has low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), poor delineation of lesion borders, and is prone to image artifacts. We demonstrate that intracortical lesions can be identified and classified with greater confidence by the combination of DIR with phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 16 subjects with MS were included in this study. DIR, PSIR, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images were acquired and inspected by 3 experts, with identification of lesions by consensus. PSIR and DIR images were jointly used to classify lesions as purely intracortical, mixed gray-white matter, and juxtacortical. The difference in the number of lesions detected in each category was compared between combined PSIR and DIR and conventional FLAIR. RESULTS: PSIR consistently allowed a clearer classification and delineation of lesions. Combined PSIR and DIR images showed a 337% improvement in the total number of lesions detected compared with FLAIR alone. Detection of intracortical lesions was improved by 417% compared with FLAIR. Detection of mixed gray-white matter and juxtacortical lesions was improved by 396% and 130%, respectively, compared with FLAIR. CONCLUSION: Reliable detection and classification of intracortical lesions in MS are greatly improved by combined use of PSIR and DIR.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Accurate detection and classification of purely intracortical lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS) are important in understanding their role in disease progression and impact on the clinical manifestations of the disease. However, detection of these lesions with conventional MR imaging remains a challenge. Although double inversion recovery (DIR) has been shown to improve the sensitivity of the detection of cortical lesions, this sequence has low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), poor delineation of lesion borders, and is prone to image artifacts. We demonstrate that intracortical lesions can be identified and classified with greater confidence by the combination of DIR with phase-sensitive inversion recovery (PSIR) images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 16 subjects with MS were included in this study. DIR, PSIR, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images were acquired and inspected by 3 experts, with identification of lesions by consensus. PSIR and DIR images were jointly used to classify lesions as purely intracortical, mixed gray-white matter, and juxtacortical. The difference in the number of lesions detected in each category was compared between combined PSIR and DIR and conventional FLAIR. RESULTS: PSIR consistently allowed a clearer classification and delineation of lesions. Combined PSIR and DIR images showed a 337% improvement in the total number of lesions detected compared with FLAIR alone. Detection of intracortical lesions was improved by 417% compared with FLAIR. Detection of mixed gray-white matter and juxtacortical lesions was improved by 396% and 130%, respectively, compared with FLAIR. CONCLUSION: Reliable detection and classification of intracortical lesions in MS are greatly improved by combined use of PSIR and DIR.
Authors: R H Lazeron; D W Langdon; M Filippi; J H van Waesberghe; V L Stevenson; J B Boringa; D Origgi; A J Thompson; M Falautano; C H Polman; F Barkhof Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Jeroen J G Geurts; Lars Bö; Petra J W Pouwels; Jonas A Castelijns; Chris H Polman; Frederik Barkhof Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jeroen J G Geurts; Petra J W Pouwels; Bernard M J Uitdehaag; Chris H Polman; Frederik Barkhof; Jonas A Castelijns Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: W I McDonald; A Compston; G Edan; D Goodkin; H P Hartung; F D Lublin; H F McFarland; D W Paty; C H Polman; S C Reingold; M Sandberg-Wollheim; W Sibley; A Thompson; S van den Noort; B Y Weinshenker; J S Wolinsky Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Frederik Barkhof; Jack H Simon; Franz Fazekas; Marco Rovaris; Ludwig Kappos; Nicola de Stefano; Chris H Polman; John Petkau; Ernst W Radue; Maria P Sormani; David K Li; Paul O'Connor; Xavier Montalban; David H Miller; Massimo Filippi Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Bruno P Soares; Samuel G Porter; Amit M Saindane; Seena Dehkharghani; Nilesh K Desai Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2015-11-03 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Jan-Mendelt Tillema; Stephen D Weigand; Jay Mandrekar; Yunhong Shu; Claudia F Lucchinetti; Istvan Pirko; John D Port Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2016-10-03 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Nico Papinutto; Regina Schlaeger; Valentina Panara; Eduardo Caverzasi; Sinyeob Ahn; Kevin J Johnson; Alyssa H Zhu; William A Stern; Gerhard Laub; Stephen L Hauser; Roland G Henry Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-12-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Augustin Lecler; C Bouzad; R Deschamps; F Maizeroi; J C Sadik; A Gueguen; O Gout; H Picard; J Savatovsky Journal: J Neurol Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.849