Jackie F Price1, Ioanna Tzoulaki, Amanda J Lee, F Gerald R Fowkes. 1. Wolfson Unit for Prevention of Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK. Jackie.Price@ed.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive value of the ankle brachial index (ABI) and carotid intima media thickness (IMT) for cardiovascular events. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Population-based cohort study. New cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, angina, and intermittent claudication) were ascertained over a 12-year period in 1,007 men and women aged 60-79 and free of MI or stroke. RESULTS: The positive and negative predictive values for an ABI<or=0.9, an IMT>or=0.9mm and for both tests abnormal were not substantially different. However, event rates in subjects with one test normal were increased when the alternate test proved positive (in people with a normal ABI test, 20.8% with an abnormal IMT developed MI/stroke compared with only 10.3% with a normal IMT). The area under the receiver operator curves (AUC) increased significantly between a model containing only age and sex (AUC 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55, 0.65) and that with either ABI (AUC 0.63, 95% CI 0.58, 0.69, P=0.002) or IMT (AUC 0.62, 95% CI 0.57, 0.67, P=0.005) added. The AUC increased further when both tests were added simultaneously (AUC 0.65, 95% CI 0.60, 0.70, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The ability of the ABI to predict cardiovascular disease was similar to that of the IMT. Combination of the two tests may be advantageous when the second test is applied to people with a negative first test and/or when the results are used as continuous variables.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive value of the ankle brachial index (ABI) and carotid intima media thickness (IMT) for cardiovascular events. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Population-based cohort study. New cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, angina, and intermittent claudication) were ascertained over a 12-year period in 1,007 men and women aged 60-79 and free of MI or stroke. RESULTS: The positive and negative predictive values for an ABI<or=0.9, an IMT>or=0.9mm and for both tests abnormal were not substantially different. However, event rates in subjects with one test normal were increased when the alternate test proved positive (in people with a normal ABI test, 20.8% with an abnormal IMT developed MI/stroke compared with only 10.3% with a normal IMT). The area under the receiver operator curves (AUC) increased significantly between a model containing only age and sex (AUC 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55, 0.65) and that with either ABI (AUC 0.63, 95% CI 0.58, 0.69, P=0.002) or IMT (AUC 0.62, 95% CI 0.57, 0.67, P=0.005) added. The AUC increased further when both tests were added simultaneously (AUC 0.65, 95% CI 0.60, 0.70, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The ability of the ABI to predict cardiovascular disease was similar to that of the IMT. Combination of the two tests may be advantageous when the second test is applied to people with a negative first test and/or when the results are used as continuous variables.
Authors: Rosalba Hernandez; Norrina Bai Allen; Kiang Liu; Jeremiah Stamler; Kathryn Jean Reid; Phyllis C Zee; Donghong Wu; Joseph Kang; Daniel B Garside; Martha L Daviglus Journal: Prev Med Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: H M den Ruijter; S A E Peters; K A Groenewegen; T J Anderson; A R Britton; J M Dekker; G Engström; M J Eijkemans; G W Evans; J de Graaf; D E Grobbee; B Hedblad; A Hofman; S Holewijn; A Ikeda; M Kavousi; K Kitagawa; A Kitamura; H Koffijberg; M A Ikram; E M Lonn; M W Lorenz; E B Mathiesen; G Nijpels; S Okazaki; D H O'Leary; J F Polak; J F Price; C Robertson; C M Rembold; M Rosvall; T Rundek; J T Salonen; M Sitzer; C D A Stehouwer; J C Witteman; K G Moons; M L Bots Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Michiel L Bots; Karlijn A Groenewegen; Todd J Anderson; Annie R Britton; Jacqueline M Dekker; Gunnar Engström; Greg W Evans; Jacqueline de Graaf; Diederick E Grobbee; Bo Hedblad; Albert Hofman; Suzanne Holewijn; Ai Ikeda; Maryam Kavousi; Kazuo Kitagawa; Akihiko Kitamura; M Arfan Ikram; Eva M Lonn; Matthias W Lorenz; Ellisiv B Mathiesen; Giel Nijpels; Shuhei Okazaki; Daniel H O'Leary; Joseph F Polak; Jacqueline F Price; Christine Robertson; Christopher M Rembold; Maria Rosvall; Tatjana Rundek; Jukka T Salonen; Matthias Sitzer; Coen D A Stehouwer; Oscar H Franco; Sanne A E Peters; Hester M den Ruijter Journal: Hypertension Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Matthias W Lorenz; Jackie F Price; Christine Robertson; Michiel L Bots; Joseph F Polak; Holger Poppert; Maryam Kavousi; Marcus Dörr; Eva Stensland; Pierre Ducimetiere; Kimmo Ronkainen; Stefan Kiechl; Matthias Sitzer; Tatjana Rundek; Lars Lind; Jing Liu; Göran Bergström; Liliana Grigore; Lena Bokemark; Alfonsa Friera; David Yanez; Horst Bickel; M Arfan Ikram; Henry Völzke; Stein Harald Johnsen; Jean Philippe Empana; Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen; Peter Willeit; Helmuth Steinmetz; Moise Desvarieux; Wuxiang Xie; Caroline Schmidt; Giuseppe D Norata; Carmen Suarez; Dirk Sander; Albert Hofman; Ulf Schminke; Ellisiv Mathiesen; Matthieu Plichart; Jussi Kauhanen; Johann Willeit; Ralph L Sacco; Stela McLachlan; Dong Zhao; Björn Fagerberg; Alberico L Catapano; Rafael Gabriel; Oscar H Franco; Alpaslan Bülbül; Frank Scheckenbach; Anja Pflug; Lu Gao; Simon G Thompson Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Thanh-Huyen T Vu; Jeremiah Stamler; Kiang Liu; Mary M McDermott; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Amber Pirzada; Daniel B Garside; Martha L Daviglus Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 5.501