Literature DB >> 17884129

Intercepting free falling objects: better use Occam's razor than internalize Newton's law.

Robin Baurès1, Nicolas Benguigui, Michel-Ange Amorim, Isabelle Anne Siegler.   

Abstract

Several studies have recently provided empirical data supporting the view that gravity has been embodied in a quantitative internal model of gravity thereby permitting access to exact time-to-contact (TTC) when intercepting a free falling object. In this review, we discuss theoretical and methodological concerns with the experiments that supposedly support the assumption of a predictive and accurate model of gravity. Having done so, we then propose that only a "qualitative implicit physics knowledge" of the effects of gravity is used as an approximate pre-information that influences timing of interceptive actions in the specific case of free falling objects. Clear evidence remains to be provided to define how this knowledge is combined with optical information for on-line timing of interceptive actions.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17884129     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  13 in total

1.  Eye movements and manual interception of ballistic trajectories: effects of law of motion perturbations and occlusions.

Authors:  Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti; Gianfranco Bosco
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Representational gravity: Empirical findings and theoretical implications.

Authors:  Timothy L Hubbard
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-02

3.  Egocentric and allocentric reference frames for catching a falling object.

Authors:  Anne Brec'hed Le Séac'h; Patrice Senot; Joseph McIntyre
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Prospective versus predictive control in timing of hitting a falling ball.

Authors:  Hiromu Katsumata; Daniel M Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  On-line and model-based approaches to the visual control of action.

Authors:  Huaiyong Zhao; William H Warren
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Hand interception of occluded motion in humans: a test of model-based vs. on-line control.

Authors:  Barbara La Scaleia; Myrka Zago; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Timing of anticipatory muscle tensing control: responses before and after expected impact.

Authors:  Peter M Vishton; Kristin M Reardon; Jennifer A Stevens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Catching what we can't see: manual interception of occluded fly-ball trajectories.

Authors:  Gianfranco Bosco; Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Slacklining: A narrative review on the origins, neuromechanical models and therapeutic use.

Authors:  Charles Philip Gabel; Bernard Guy; Hamid Reza Mokhtarinia; Markus Melloh
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-06-18

10.  Synergies between optical and physical variables in intercepting parabolic targets.

Authors:  José Gómez; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.