Literature DB >> 17882749

Surgical complications of microendoscopic procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis.

K Ikuta1, O Tono, T Tanaka, J Arima, S Nakano, K Sasaki, M Oga.   

Abstract

Microendoscopic discectomy (MED) is one of the minimally invasive endoscopic procedures for treating lumbar disc herniation. We have applied MED techniques to posterior decompression procedures for treating lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). In the present study, we examined the surgical complications in 114 consecutive patients surgically treated with MED procedures for LSS. Intraoperative complications occurred in 9 patients. Six patients (5.3%) experienced a dural tear, and three (2.6%) had a fracture of an inferior facet. Early postoperative complications occurred in 13 patients. Twelve patients (10.5%) experienced transient neurological complications. The clinical outcomes at the mean 28-month follow-up were not affected by these surgical complications. Other major complications such as nerve injury and surgical site infection were not observed. Most of the complications occurred in the initial series of patients, and the incidence of complications decreased with an increase in the surgeon's experience and the application of several preventive measures against the complications. The surgeon should undergo training when MED techniques are applied in surgical treatment in order to recognize the specific complications associated with such procedures and apply preventive measures against these complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17882749     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-985152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg        ISSN: 0946-7211


  9 in total

Review 1.  Paradigm changes in spine surgery: evolution of minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  Zachary A Smith; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Finite element analysis for comparison of spinous process osteotomies technique with conventional laminectomy as lumbar decompression procedure.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Heoung-Jae Chun; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Hwan-Mo Lee; Bong-Soon Chang; Choon-Ki Lee; Jin-S Yeom
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  Endoscopic lumbar discectomy: Experience of first 100 cases.

Authors:  Amit Jhala; Manish Mistry
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.251

4.  Is biportal technique/endoscopic spinal surgery satisfactory for lumbar spinal stenosis patients?: A prospective randomized comparative study.

Authors:  Taewook Kang; Si Young Park; Chun Hyung Kang; Soon Hyuck Lee; Jong Hoon Park; Seung Woo Suh
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  The microendoscopic decompression of lumbar stenosis: a review of the current literature and clinical results.

Authors:  Albert P Wong; Zachary A Smith; Rohan R Lall; Lacey E Bresnahan; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2012-07-31

6.  Complications of minimally invasive, tubular access surgery for cervical, thoracic, and lumbar surgery.

Authors:  Donald A Ross
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2014-07-07

Review 7.  Complications of Anterior and Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Keith Dip-Kei Luk
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2016-04-15

Review 8.  Endoscopic inter laminar management of lumbar disease.

Authors:  Yad Ram Yadav; Vijay Parihar; Yatin Kher; Pushp Raj Bhatele
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

Review 9.  Microendoscopic Lumbar Posterior Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Literature Review.

Authors:  Akinobu Suzuki; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.