OBJECTIVE: To assess hippocampal atrophy rates calculated from fluid registration methods. METHODS: Hippocampi were segmented on baseline and registered-repeat scans of 32 probable Alzheimer disease (AD) subjects and 55 controls. Fluid-based atrophy rates were calculated. RESULTS: In AD patients, the mean (SD) atrophy rates for manual, fluidly propagated, and Jacobian methods were 5.09 (3.59), 5.34 (3.43), and 3.55 (2.70) (percentage per year). In controls, atrophy rates were 1.31 (2.00), 0.89 (0.75), and 0.56 (1.12) (percentage per year). In AD, fluid propagation and manual rates were similar in means (P = 0.55) and variances (P = 0.71). Jacobian rates were smaller in mean (P = 0.002) and variance (P = 0.026) than in manual rates. In controls, fluid-propagated rates were similar in mean to manual rates (P = 0.12), but less variable (P < 0.0001). Jacobian rates were smaller in mean (P = 0.014) and less variable (P < 0.0001) than in manual rates. Both fluid methods were superior to manual measures in separating AD from controls (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Fluid-based methods may be useful in large serial hippocampal studies.
OBJECTIVE: To assess hippocampal atrophy rates calculated from fluid registration methods. METHODS: Hippocampi were segmented on baseline and registered-repeat scans of 32 probable Alzheimer disease (AD) subjects and 55 controls. Fluid-based atrophy rates were calculated. RESULTS: In AD patients, the mean (SD) atrophy rates for manual, fluidly propagated, and Jacobian methods were 5.09 (3.59), 5.34 (3.43), and 3.55 (2.70) (percentage per year). In controls, atrophy rates were 1.31 (2.00), 0.89 (0.75), and 0.56 (1.12) (percentage per year). In AD, fluid propagation and manual rates were similar in means (P = 0.55) and variances (P = 0.71). Jacobian rates were smaller in mean (P = 0.002) and variance (P = 0.026) than in manual rates. In controls, fluid-propagated rates were similar in mean to manual rates (P = 0.12), but less variable (P < 0.0001). Jacobian rates were smaller in mean (P = 0.014) and less variable (P < 0.0001) than in manual rates. Both fluid methods were superior to manual measures in separating AD from controls (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Fluid-based methods may be useful in large serial hippocampal studies.
Authors: Jorge Jovicich; Silvester Czanner; Xiao Han; David Salat; Andre van der Kouwe; Brian Quinn; Jenni Pacheco; Marilyn Albert; Ronald Killiany; Deborah Blacker; Paul Maguire; Diana Rosas; Nikos Makris; Randy Gollub; Anders Dale; Bradford C Dickerson; Bruce Fischl Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-02-20 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: W J P Henneman; H Vrenken; J Barnes; I C Sluimer; N A Verwey; M A Blankenstein; M Klein; N C Fox; P Scheltens; F Barkhof; W M van der Flier Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-09-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Alex D Leow; Igor Yanovsky; Neelroop Parikshak; Xue Hua; Suh Lee; Arthur W Toga; Clifford R Jack; Matt A Bernstein; Paula J Britson; Jeffrey L Gunter; Chadwick P Ward; Bret Borowski; Leslie M Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; Adam S Fleisher; Danielle Harvey; John Kornak; Norbert Schuff; Gene E Alexander; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2009-04-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: W J P Henneman; J D Sluimer; J Barnes; W M van der Flier; I C Sluimer; N C Fox; P Scheltens; H Vrenken; F Barkhof Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-03-17 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Marin E Ranta; Min Chen; Deana Crocetti; Jerry L Prince; Krish Subramaniam; Bruce Fischl; Walter E Kaufmann; Stewart H Mostofsky Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2013-07-29 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Kelvin K Leung; Josephine Barnes; Gerard R Ridgway; Jonathan W Bartlett; Matthew J Clarkson; Kate Macdonald; Norbert Schuff; Nick C Fox; Sebastien Ourselin Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Valerie M Anderson; Jonathan M Schott; Jonathan W Bartlett; Kelvin K Leung; David H Miller; Nick C Fox Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Ian B Malone; David Cash; Gerard R Ridgway; David G MacManus; Sebastien Ourselin; Nick C Fox; Jonathan M Schott Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2012-12-28 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Manja Lehmann; Josephine Barnes; Gerard R Ridgway; Natalie S Ryan; Elizabeth K Warrington; Sebastian J Crutch; Nick C Fox Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2012-02-23 Impact factor: 21.566