OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether baseline CSF biomarkers are associated with hippocampal atrophy rate as a measure of disease progression in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD), patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and controls, controlling for baseline neuropsychological and MRI findings. METHODS: We assessed data from 31 patients with AD, 25 patients with MCI, and 19 controls (mean age 68 +/- 8 years; 39 [52%] female) who visited our memory clinic and had received serial MRI scanning (scan interval 1.7 +/- 0.7 years). At baseline, CSF biomarkers (amyloid beta 1-42, tau, and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 [p-tau]) were obtained, as well as neuropsychological data. Baseline MRI scans were assessed using visual rating scales for medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA), global cortical atrophy, and white matter hyperintensities. Hippocampal atrophy rates were estimated using regional nonlinear "fluid" registration of follow-up scan to baseline scan. RESULTS: Stepwise multiple linear regression, adjusted for age and sex, showed that increased CSF p-tau levels (beta [standard error]: -0.79 [0.35]) at baseline was independently associated with higher subsequent hippocampal atrophy rates (p < 0.05), together with poorer memory performance (0.09 [0.04]) and more severe MTA (-0.60 [0.21]). The association of memory function with hippocampal atrophy rate was explained by the link with diagnosis, because it disappeared from the model after we additionally corrected for diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline CSF levels of tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 are independently associated with subsequent disease progression, as reflected by hippocampal atrophy rate. This effect is independent of baseline neuropsychological and MRI predictors. Our results imply that predicting disease progression can best be achieved by combining information from different modalities.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether baseline CSF biomarkers are associated with hippocampal atrophy rate as a measure of disease progression in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD), patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and controls, controlling for baseline neuropsychological and MRI findings. METHODS: We assessed data from 31 patients with AD, 25 patients with MCI, and 19 controls (mean age 68 +/- 8 years; 39 [52%] female) who visited our memory clinic and had received serial MRI scanning (scan interval 1.7 +/- 0.7 years). At baseline, CSF biomarkers (amyloid beta 1-42, tau, and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 [p-tau]) were obtained, as well as neuropsychological data. Baseline MRI scans were assessed using visual rating scales for medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA), global cortical atrophy, and white matter hyperintensities. Hippocampal atrophy rates were estimated using regional nonlinear "fluid" registration of follow-up scan to baseline scan. RESULTS: Stepwise multiple linear regression, adjusted for age and sex, showed that increased CSF p-tau levels (beta [standard error]: -0.79 [0.35]) at baseline was independently associated with higher subsequent hippocampal atrophy rates (p < 0.05), together with poorer memory performance (0.09 [0.04]) and more severe MTA (-0.60 [0.21]). The association of memory function with hippocampal atrophy rate was explained by the link with diagnosis, because it disappeared from the model after we additionally corrected for diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline CSF levels of tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 are independently associated with subsequent disease progression, as reflected by hippocampal atrophy rate. This effect is independent of baseline neuropsychological and MRI predictors. Our results imply that predicting disease progression can best be achieved by combining information from different modalities.
Authors: R C Petersen; C R Jack; Y C Xu; S C Waring; P C O'Brien; G E Smith; R J Ivnik; E G Tangalos; B F Boeve; E Kokmen Journal: Neurology Date: 2000-02-08 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jasper D Sluimer; Femke H Bouwman; Hugo Vrenken; Marinus A Blankenstein; Frederik Barkhof; Wiesje M van der Flier; Philip Scheltens Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2008-08-08 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: C R Jack; D W Dickson; J E Parisi; Y C Xu; R H Cha; P C O'Brien; S D Edland; G E Smith; B F Boeve; E G Tangalos; E Kokmen; R C Petersen Journal: Neurology Date: 2002-03-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: C R Jack; R C Petersen; Y Xu; P C O'Brien; G E Smith; R J Ivnik; B F Boeve; E G Tangalos; E Kokmen Journal: Neurology Date: 2000-08-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: M Bobinski; M J de Leon; J Wegiel; S Desanti; A Convit; L A Saint Louis; H Rusinek; H M Wisniewski Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2000 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: Peter Schönknecht; Johannes Pantel; Tobias Hartmann; Egon Werle; Martin Volkmann; Marco Essig; Michael Amann; Nadja Zanabili; Hubertus Bardenheuer; Aoife Hunt; Johannes Schröder Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2003-10-15 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Claudia Ditzen; Ning Tang; Archana M Jastorff; Larysa Teplytska; Alexander Yassouridis; Giuseppina Maccarrone; Manfred Uhr; Thomas Bronisch; Christine A Miller; Florian Holsboer; Christoph W Turck Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Liana G Apostolova; Kristy S Hwang; John P Andrawis; Amity E Green; Sona Babakchanian; Jonathan H Morra; Jeffrey L Cummings; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski; Leslie M Shaw; Clifford R Jack; Ronald C Petersen; Paul S Aisen; William J Jagust; Robert A Koeppe; Chester A Mathis; Michael W Weiner; Paul M Thompson Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2010-06-11 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Karen S SantaCruz; Joshua A Sonnen; Maryam Kherad Pezhouh; Mark F Desrosiers; Peter T Nelson; Suzanne L Tyas Journal: J Neuropathol Exp Neurol Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.685
Authors: Nikki H Stricker; Hiroko H Dodge; N Maritza Dowling; S Duke Han; Elena A Erosheva; William J Jagust Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Gloria C Chiang; Philip S Insel; Duygu Tosun; Norbert Schuff; Diana Truran-Sacrey; Sky T Raptentsetsang; Paul M Thompson; Eric M Reiman; Clifford R Jack; Nick C Fox; William J Jagust; Danielle J Harvey; Laurel A Beckett; Anthony Gamst; Paul S Aisen; Ron C Petersen; Michael W Weiner Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Rik Ossenkoppele; Niklas Mattsson; Charlotte E Teunissen; Frederik Barkhof; Yolande Pijnenburg; Philip Scheltens; Wiesje M van der Flier; Gil D Rabinovici Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2015-04-25 Impact factor: 4.673