Literature DB >> 17878295

Species-specific positive selection of the male-specific lethal complex that participates in dosage compensation in Drosophila.

Monica A Rodriguez1, Danielle Vermaak, Joshua J Bayes, Harmit S Malik.   

Abstract

In many taxa, males and females have unequal ratios of sex chromosomes to autosomes, which has resulted in the invention of diverse mechanisms to equilibrate gene expression between the sexes (dosage compensation). Failure to compensate for sex chromosome dosage results in male lethality in Drosophila. In Drosophila, a male-specific lethal (MSL) complex of proteins and noncoding RNAs binds to hundreds of sites on the single male X chromosome and up-regulates gene expression. Here we use population genetics of two closely related Drosophila species to show that adaptive evolution has occurred in all five protein-coding genes of the MSL complex. This positive selection is asymmetric between closely related species, with a very strong signature apparent in Drosophila melanogaster but not in Drosophila simulans. In particular, the MSL1 and MSL2 proteins have undergone dramatic positive selection in D. melanogaster, in domains previously shown to be responsible for their specific targeting to the X chromosome. This signature of positive selection at an essential protein-DNA interface of the complex is unexpected and suggests that X chromosomal MSL-binding DNA segments may themselves be changing rapidly. This highly asymmetric, rapid evolution of the MSL genes further suggests that misregulated dosage compensation may represent one of the underlying causes of male hybrid inviability in Drosophila, wherein the fate of hybrid males depends on which species' X chromosome is inherited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17878295      PMCID: PMC2000485          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0707445104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  63 in total

1.  Genome-scale profiling of histone H3.3 replacement patterns.

Authors:  Yoshiko Mito; Jorja G Henikoff; Steven Henikoff
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-09-11       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  Structure of the chromo barrel domain from the MOF acetyltransferase.

Authors:  Peter R Nielsen; Daniel Nietlispach; Alessia Buscaino; Rosemary J Warner; Asifa Akhtar; Alexey G Murzin; Natalia V Murzina; Ernest D Laue
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Host defenses to transposable elements and the evolution of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  J F McDonald; M A Matzke; A J Matzke
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  Gene expression analysis of the function of the male-specific lethal complex in Drosophila.

Authors:  Manika Pal Bhadra; Utpal Bhadra; Joydeep Kundu; James A Birchler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The amino-terminal region of Drosophila MSL1 contains basic, glycine-rich, and leucine zipper-like motifs that promote X chromosome binding, self-association, and MSL2 binding, respectively.

Authors:  Fang Li; David A D Parry; Maxwell J Scott
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  The MRG domain mediates the functional integration of MSL3 into the dosage compensation complex.

Authors:  Violette Morales; Catherine Regnard; Annalisa Izzo; Irene Vetter; Peter B Becker
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  A functional dosage compensation complex required for male killing in Drosophila.

Authors:  Zoe Veneti; Joanna K Bentley; Takao Koana; Henk R Braig; Gregory D D Hurst
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Genome-wide HP1 binding in Drosophila: developmental plasticity and genomic targeting signals.

Authors:  Elzo de Wit; Frauke Greil; Bas van Steensel
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Sequence signature analysis of chromosome identity in three Drosophila species.

Authors:  Per Stenberg; Fredrik Pettersson; Anja O Saura; Anders Berglund; Jan Larsson
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  X chromosome sites autonomously recruit the dosage compensation complex in Drosophila males.

Authors:  Delphine Fagegaltier; Bruce S Baker
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  32 in total

1.  Comparative evolution of photosynthetic genes in response to polyploid and nonpolyploid duplication.

Authors:  Jeremy E Coate; Jessica A Schlueter; Adam M Whaley; Jeff J Doyle
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  Drosophila dosage compensation: a complex voyage to the X chromosome.

Authors:  Marnie E Gelbart; Mitzi I Kuroda
Journal:  Development       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  Differentiation of venoms of predatory marine gastropods: divergence of orthologous toxin genes of closely related Conus species with different dietary specializations.

Authors:  Thomas F Duda
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 4.  A surrogate approach to study the evolution of noncoding DNA elements that organize eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Danielle Vermaak; Joshua J Bayes; Harmit S Malik
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 2.645

5.  A sequence motif enriched in regions bound by the Drosophila dosage compensation complex.

Authors:  Miguel Gallach; Vicente Arnau; Rodrigo Aldecoa; Ignacio Marín
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Positive selection at the binding sites of the male-specific lethal complex involved in dosage compensation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  The W, X, Y and Z of sex-chromosome dosage compensation.

Authors:  Judith E Mank
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 8.  The gene balance hypothesis: implications for gene regulation, quantitative traits and evolution.

Authors:  James A Birchler; Reiner A Veitia
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 10.151

9.  X chromosomal regulation in flies: when less is more.

Authors:  Erinc Hallacli; Asifa Akhtar
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.239

Review 10.  Progress and prospects toward our understanding of the evolution of dosage compensation.

Authors:  Beatriz Vicoso; Doris Bachtrog
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.239

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.