Literature DB >> 17877628

New shade guide for evaluation of tooth whitening--colorimetric study.

Rade D Paravina1, William M Johnston, John M Powers.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: Available shade guides lack colorimetric uniformity, which compromises the validity of visual evaluation of tooth whitening efficacy.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to perform a colorimetric analysis of a new shade guide designed primarily for the visual evaluation of tooth whitening efficacy and to compare this shade guide with two commercial shade guides.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Color ranges and color distribution of three shade guides (prototype of the new Vita Bleachedguide 3D-Master [BG, Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany], value scale of Vitapan Classical [VC, Vita], and color-ordered Trubyte Bioform porcelain shade guide [TB, Dentsply International, York, PA, USA]) were analyzed (N=3). A circular area (d=1.7 mm) on the middle of the labial surface of the tab, excluding the cervical portion, was measured with a spectroradiometer (D65, 2). Whiteness and yellowness indices were computed. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance and Fisher's PLSD test at a 0.05 level of significance.
RESULTS: The range of color difference (DeltaE*) from the lightest to the darkest tab was 33.8 (BG), 17.1 (VC), and 23.2 (TB). Mean values of DeltaE* among pairs of adjacent tabs were 3.0 (BG), 4.2 (VC), and 3.3 (TB). BG exhibited the highest R2 values between color coordinate pairs and between whiteness and yellowness indices with the respective color coordinates.
CONCLUSIONS: BG exhibited the widest color range and had the most consistent color distribution as compared with the two commercial products. Extension of the lightness range of BG toward higher L* values (bleach shades) was confirmed. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A dental shade guide that is colorimetrically uniform might increase the reliability of visual comparisons of tooth whitening efficacy, whereas the inclusion of realistic bleaching shades in the shade guide will complement contemporary esthetic dentistry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17877628     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2007.00118_1.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Esthet Restor Dent        ISSN: 1496-4155            Impact factor:   2.843


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of the Easyshade Compact and Advance in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Andreas Zenthöfer; Tomas Cabrera; Nicoleta Corcodel; Peter Rammelsberg; Alexander J Hassel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Bleaching efficacy and quality of life of different bleaching techniques - randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ruben Pereira; João Silveira; Susana Dias; Ana Cardoso; António Mata; Duarte Marques
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.606

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.