Literature DB >> 1787719

Frequency discrimination as a function of signal frequency and level in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

R L Freyman1, D A Nelson.   

Abstract

Frequency difference limens (DLFs) for pure tones were obtained over a wide range of frequencies and levels from 7 normal-hearing subjects and 16 ears of 12 listeners with sensorineural hearing losses. The normal data were fitted with a general prediction equation. Variability of the data around the DLFs estimated by the equation was quantified and used to evaluate the DLFs from the hearing-impaired listeners. The majority of DLFs from impaired listeners were poorer than one standard deviation above the estimates of the normal equation at all frequencies and sensation levels (SLs). The portion of the equation concerned with sensation level was fitted to each listener's data at each frequency. The slopes of these functions indicated that, on average, the rate of improvement of the DLF with sensation level was similar in the two groups of subjects. These results suggest that it would be reasonable to compare DLFs from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners at equivalent sensation levels. The intercepts of the DLF-intensity functions represent asymptotic values obtained at high SLs. These asymptotic DLFs were abnormal in the majority of hearing-impaired subjects, with more than half the data in excess of two standard deviations above normal. However, among those subjects, the correlation between the DLF deficit and the amount of hearing loss at the test frequency was not strong (r = +.27).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1787719     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3406.1371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  8 in total

Review 1.  Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony and its perceptual consequences.

Authors:  Gary Rance
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2005

2.  Phonological processing in adults with deficits in musical pitch recognition.

Authors:  Jennifer L Jones; Jay Lucker; Christopher Zalewski; Carmen Brewer; Dennis Drayna
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Characterizing the dependence of pure-tone frequency difference limens on frequency, duration, and level.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Li Xiao; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Residual inhibition functions overlap tinnitus spectra and the region of auditory threshold shift.

Authors:  Larry E Roberts; Graeme Moffat; Michael Baumann; Lawrence M Ward; Daniel J Bosnyak
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-08-20

5.  Evaluation of central auditory discrimination abilities in older adults.

Authors:  Claudia Freigang; Lucas Schmidt; Jan Wagner; Rahel Eckardt; Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen; Arne Ernst; Rudolf Rübsamen
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 5.750

6.  Effects of Hearing Loss on School-Aged Children's Ability to Benefit From F0 Differences Between Target and Masker Speech.

Authors:  Mary M Flaherty; Jenna Browning; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Abnormal pitch perception produced by cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Qing Tang; Thomas Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Verification of a Mobile Psychoacoustic Test System.

Authors:  Jordana C Soares; Sangamanatha A Veeranna; Vijay Parsa; Chris Allan; Winnie Ly; Minh Duong; Paula Folkeard; Sheila Moodie; Prudence Allen
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2021-12-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.