Literature DB >> 17876877

24-hour esophageal pH-monitoring in children suspected of gastroesophageal reflux disease: analysis of intraesophageal pH monitoring values recorded in distal and proximal channel at diagnosis.

Janusz Semeniuk1, Maciej Kaczmarski.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess values of 24-h esophageal pH-monitoring parameters with dual-channel probe (distal and proximal channel) in children suspected of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
METHODS: 264 children suspected of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) were enrolled in a study (mean age c=20.78+/-17.23 mo). The outcomes of this study, immunoallerrgological tests and positive result of oral food challenge test with a potentially noxious nutrient, enabled to qualify children into particular study groups.
RESULTS: 32 (12.1%) infants (group 1) had physiological GER diagnosed. Pathological acid GER was confirmed in 138 (52.3%) children. Primary GER was diagnosed in 76 (28.8%) children (group 2) and GER secondary to allergy to cow milk protein and/or other food (CMA/FA) in 62 (23.5%) children (group 3). 32 (12.1%) of them had CMA/FA (group 4-reference group), and in remaining 62 (23.5%) children neither GER nor CMA/FA was confirmed (group 5). Mean values of pH monitoring parameters measured in distal and proximal channel were analyzed in individual groups. This analysis showed statistically significant differentiation of mean values in the case of: number of episodes of acid GER, episodes of acid GER lasting >5 min, duration of the longest episode of acid GER in both channels, acid GER index total and supine in proximal channel. Statistically significant differences of mean values among examined groups, especially between group 2 and 3 in the case of total acid GER index (only distal channel) were confirmed.
CONCLUSION: 24-h esophageal pH monitoring confirmed pathological acid GER in 52.3% of children with typical and atypical symptoms of GERD. The similar pH-monitoring values obtained in group 2 and 3 confirm the necessity of implementation of differential diagnosis for primary vs secondary cause of GER.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17876877      PMCID: PMC4434641          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i38.5108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  27 in total

1.  Extraesophageal pediatric reflux: 24-hour double-probe pH monitoring of 222 children.

Authors:  J P Little; B L Matthews; M S Glock; J A Koufman; D M Reboussin; C J Loughlin; W F McGuirt
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1997-07

2.  Gastroesophageal reflux associated with cow's milk allergy in infants: which diagnostic examinations are useful?

Authors:  F Cavataio; G Iacono; G Montalto; M Soresi; M Tumminello; P Campagna; A Notarbartolo; A Carroccio
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Normal ranges of continuous pH monitoring in the proximal esophagus.

Authors:  B Bagucka; H Badriul; K Vandemaele; E Troch; Y Vandenplas
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 4.  The interpretation of oesophageal pH monitoring data.

Authors:  Y Vandenplas; H Loeb
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  24-hour oesophageal two-level pH monitoring in healthy children and adolescents.

Authors:  P M Gustafsson; L Tibbling
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Gastroesophageal reflux in children and adolescents. clinical aspects with special respect to food hypersensitivity.

Authors:  J Semeniuk; M Kaczmarski
Journal:  Adv Med Sci       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.287

7.  PH monitoring in the distal and proximal esophagus in symptomatic infants.

Authors:  A Arana; B Bagucka; B Hauser; B Hegar; D Urbain; L Kaufman; Y Vandenplas
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.839

8.  Simultaneous prolonged recordings of proximal and distal intraesophageal pH in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease and respiratory symptoms.

Authors:  S Cucchiara; F Santamaria; R Minella; E Alfieri; A Scoppa; F Calabrese; M T Franco; B Rea; G Salvia
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Gastroesophageal reflux in children. Clinical profile, course and outcome with active therapy in 126 cases.

Authors:  R W Shepherd; J Wren; S Evans; M Lander; T H Ong
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.168

10.  IgG anti-betalactoglobulin (betalactotest): its usefulness in the diagnosis of cow's milk allergy.

Authors:  G Iacono; A Carroccio; F Cavataio; G Montalto; D Lorello; I Kazmierska; M Soresi
Journal:  Ital J Gastroenterol       Date:  1995-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Do gastrointestinal and respiratory signs and symptoms correlate with the severity of gastroesophageal reflux?

Authors:  Hakan Uzun; Demet Alagoz; Mesut Okur; Bunyamin Dikici; Kenan Kocabay; Dursun Ali Senses; Aybars Ozkan; Murat Kaya
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.067

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.