Literature DB >> 17876673

Surgery for rectal cancer performed at teaching hospitals improves survival and preserves continence.

Juan C Gutierrez1, Noor Kassira, Rabih M Salloum, Dido Franceschi, Leonidas G Koniaris.   

Abstract

We sought to compare the outcomes of teaching and community hospitals on long-term outcomes for patients with rectal cancer. All rectal adenocarcinomas treated in Florida from 1994 to 2000 were examined. Overall, 5,925 operative cases were identified. Teaching hospitals treated 12.5% of patients with a larger proportion of regionally advanced, metastatic disease, as well as high-grade tumors. Five- and 10-year overall survival rates at teaching hospitals were 64.8 and 53.9%, compared to 59.1 and 50.5% at community hospitals (P = 0.002). The greatest impact on survival was observed for the highest stage tumors: patients with metastatic rectal adenocarcinoma experienced 5- and 10-year survival rates of 30.5 and 26.6% at teaching hospitals compared to 19.6 and 17.4% at community hospitals (P = 0.009). Multimodality therapy was most frequently administered in teaching hospitals as was low anterior resection. On multivariate analysis, treatment at a teaching hospital was a significant independent predictor of improved survival (hazard ratio = 0.834, P = 0.005). Rectal cancer patients treated at teaching hospitals have significantly better survival than those treated at community-based hospitals. Patients with high-grade tumors or advanced disease should be provided the opportunity to be treated at a teaching hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17876673     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-007-0308-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  19 in total

1.  Complex gastrointestinal surgery: impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomes.

Authors:  T A Gordon; H M Bowman; E B Bass; K D Lillemoe; C J Yeo; R F Heitmiller; M A Choti; G P Burleyson; G Hsieh; J L Cameron
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  The volume-outcome relationship: don't believe everything you see.

Authors:  Caprice K Christian; Michael L Gustafson; Rebecca A Betensky; Jennifer Daley; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  The influence of hospital and surgeon volume on in-hospital mortality for colectomy, gastrectomy, and lung lobectomy in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Edward L Hannan; Mark Radzyner; David Rubin; James Dougherty; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York State hospitals.

Authors:  E L Hannan; J F O'Donnell; H Kilburn; H R Bernard; A Yazici
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Variations in treatment of rectal cancer: the influence of hospital type and caseload.

Authors:  A J Simons; R Ker; S Groshen; C Gee; G J Anthone; A E Ortega; P Vukasin; R K Ross; R W Beart
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Use of surgical procedures and adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer treatment: a population-based study.

Authors:  A T Schroen; R D Cress
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Adjuvant radiation therapy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  J W Fleshman; R J Myerson
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  The Stockholm I trial of preoperative short term radiotherapy in operable rectal carcinoma. A prospective randomized trial. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  B Cedermark; H Johansson; L E Rutqvist; N Wilking
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J E Krook; C G Moertel; L L Gunderson; H S Wieand; R T Collins; R W Beart; T P Kubista; M A Poon; W C Meyers; J A Mailliard
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-03-14       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Outcomes of surgery among the Medicare aged: surgical volume and mortality.

Authors:  G Riley; J Lubitz
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1985
View more
  6 in total

1.  Effect of academic status on outcomes of surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Kristen Cagino; Maria S Altieri; Jie Yang; Lizhou Nie; Mark Talamini; Konstantinos Spaniolas; Paula Denoya; Aurora Pryor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Analysis of super-low anterior resection for rectal cancer from a single center.

Authors:  Shao-liang Han; Xian Shen; Qi-Qiang Zeng; Sheng-chong Guo; Jun Cheng; Guan-bao Zhu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2010-09

3.  Association of Teaching Status and Mortality After Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Miranda B Lam; Kristen Riley; Winta Mehtsun; Jessica Phelan; E John Orav; Ashish K Jha; Laura G Burke
Journal:  Ann Surg Open       Date:  2021-07-23

4.  Improving quality of cancer care at community hospitals: impact of the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program pilot.

Authors:  Michael T Halpern; Pamela Spain; Debra J Holden; Andrew Stewart; Erica J McNamara; Greer Gay; Irene Prabhu Das; Steven Clauser
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Should informed consent for cancer treatment include a discussion about hospital outcome disparities?

Authors:  Nadine Housri; Robert J Weil; David I Shalowitz; Leonidas G Koniaris
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Will patients benefit from regionalization of gynecologic cancer care?

Authors:  Kathleen F Brookfield; Michael C Cheung; Relin Yang; Margaret M Byrne; Leonidas G Koniaris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.