BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Acemetacin is regarded as a pro-drug of indomethacin and induces significantly less gastric damage but the reasons for this greater gastric safety of acemetacin are unclear. The anti-inflammatory effects of acemetacin have been attributed, at least in part, to its hepatic biotransformation to indomethacin. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of acemetacin and indomethacin in an in vivo model of acute inflammation and to examine the importance of biotransformation of acemetacin (to indomethacin) to its anti-inflammatory actions. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The zymosan airpouch model was used in rats. Indomethacin or acemetacin (2.7-83.8 micromol kg(-1)) were administered orally or directly into the pouch. Leukocyte infiltration, prostaglandin (PG) E(2) and leukotriene (LT) B(4) levels in exudates, and whole blood thromboxane (TX) B(2) synthesis were measured. KEY RESULTS: Acemetacin was rapidly converted to indomethacin after its administration. Both acemetacin and indomethacin elicited comparable, dose-dependent reductions of leukocyte infiltration and of PGE(2) and TXB(2) synthesis. However, indomethacin induced more gastric damage than acemetacin and elevated LTB(4) production in the airpouch. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The similar effects of acemetacin and indomethacin on leukocyte infiltration and PG synthesis are consistent with rapid biotransformation of acemetacin to indomethacin. Some of this biotransformation may occur extra-hepatically, for instance in inflammatory exudates. Acemetacin probably exerts actions independent of conversion to indomethacin, given the different effects of these two drugs on LTB(4) production. Such differences may contribute to the relative gastric safety of acemetacin compared to indomethacin.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Acemetacin is regarded as a pro-drug of indomethacin and induces significantly less gastric damage but the reasons for this greater gastric safety of acemetacin are unclear. The anti-inflammatory effects of acemetacin have been attributed, at least in part, to its hepatic biotransformation to indomethacin. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of acemetacin and indomethacin in an in vivo model of acute inflammation and to examine the importance of biotransformation of acemetacin (to indomethacin) to its anti-inflammatory actions. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The zymosan airpouch model was used in rats. Indomethacin or acemetacin (2.7-83.8 micromol kg(-1)) were administered orally or directly into the pouch. Leukocyte infiltration, prostaglandin (PG) E(2) and leukotriene (LT) B(4) levels in exudates, and whole blood thromboxane (TX) B(2) synthesis were measured. KEY RESULTS:Acemetacin was rapidly converted to indomethacin after its administration. Both acemetacin and indomethacin elicited comparable, dose-dependent reductions of leukocyte infiltration and of PGE(2) and TXB(2) synthesis. However, indomethacin induced more gastric damage than acemetacin and elevated LTB(4) production in the airpouch. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The similar effects of acemetacin and indomethacin on leukocyte infiltration and PG synthesis are consistent with rapid biotransformation of acemetacin to indomethacin. Some of this biotransformation may occur extra-hepatically, for instance in inflammatory exudates. Acemetacin probably exerts actions independent of conversion to indomethacin, given the different effects of these two drugs on LTB(4) production. Such differences may contribute to the relative gastric safety of acemetacin compared to indomethacin.
Authors: M N Muscará; N Vergnolle; F Lovren; C R Triggle; S N Elliott; S Asfaha; J L Wallace Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: E A Ham; D D Soderman; M E Zanetti; H W Dougherty; E McCauley; F A Kuehl Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1983-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Charles N Serhan; Sue D Brain; Christopher D Buckley; Derek W Gilroy; Christopher Haslett; Luke A J O'Neill; Mauro Perretti; Adriano G Rossi; John L Wallace Journal: FASEB J Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: D R Robinson; M Skoskiewicz; K J Bloch; G Castorena; E Hayes; E Lowenstein; C Melvin; F Michelassi; W M Zapol Journal: J Exp Med Date: 1986-06-01 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: A E Chávez-Piña; L Vong; W McKnight; M Dicay; R C O Zanardo; M I Ortiz; G Castañeda-Hernández; J L Wallace Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2008-08-11 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: John J Irwin; Garrett Gaskins; Teague Sterling; Michael M Mysinger; Michael J Keiser Journal: J Chem Inf Model Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 4.956