Literature DB >> 17874932

Negative effects on family functioning from psychosocial treatments: a recommendation for expanded safety monitoring.

José Szapocznik1, Guillermo Prado.   

Abstract

Whereas biomedical products are required to be tested for safety with respect to vulnerable organ systems, psychosocial treatments are not required to be tested for safety with respect to vulnerable social systems such as the family. This article provides some evidence for the need to document the potential negative effects of psychosocial treatments on family-level outcomes. Three randomized controlled trials are reviewed in which independent ratings or self-reports of family functioning were measured. Each of the 3 studies compared the efficacy of a family and a nonfamily treatment. Totally unexpectedly, the nonfamily treatment in each of the 3 trials demonstrated significant declines in family functioning. The authors suggest that psychosocial treatments with vulnerable populations have the potential to produce negative side effects on families. Therefore, it is important to conduct further research to determine whether safety studies should be required for psychosocial treatments. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17874932     DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.3.468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Psychol        ISSN: 0893-3200


  7 in total

1.  Partnerships for the design, conduct, and analysis of effectiveness, and implementation research: experiences of the prevention science and methodology group.

Authors:  C Hendricks Brown; Sheppard G Kellam; Sheila Kaupert; Bengt O Muthén; Wei Wang; Linda K Muthén; Patricia Chamberlain; Craig L PoVey; Rick Cady; Thomas W Valente; Mitsunori Ogihara; Guillermo J Prado; Hilda M Pantin; Carlos G Gallo; José Szapocznik; Sara J Czaja; John W McManus
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2012-07

2.  Structural Ecosystems Therapy for HIV+ African-American women and drug abuse relapse.

Authors:  Daniel J Feaster; Myron J Burns; Ahnalee M Brincks; Guillermo Prado; Victoria B Mitrani; Megaly H Mauer; Jose Szapocznik
Journal:  Fam Process       Date:  2010-06

3.  Definition, assessment and rate of psychotherapy side effects.

Authors:  Michael Linden; Marie-Luise Schermuly-Haupt
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Reducing Substance Use and HIV Health Disparities among Hispanic Youth in the U.S.A.: The Familias Unidas Program of Research.

Authors:  Guillermo Prado; Hilda Pantin
Journal:  Interv Psicosoc       Date:  2011-04

5.  Programs for Prevention of Externalizing Problems in Children: Limited Evidence for Effect Beyond 6 Months Post Intervention.

Authors:  Ann-Charlotte Smedler; Anders Hjern; Stefan Wiklund; Sten Anttila; Agneta Pettersson
Journal:  Child Youth Care Forum       Date:  2014-09-25

6.  Assessing the unwanted: A systematic review of instruments used to assess negative effects of psychotherapy.

Authors:  Philipp Herzog; Sören Lauff; Winfried Rief; Eva-Lotta Brakemeier
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  How do close others to those with anxiety feel about treatment? Development and validation of the Treatment Concerns Questionnaire-Close Others.

Authors:  Olivia A Merritt; Karen Rowa; Christine L Purdon
Journal:  Cognit Ther Res       Date:  2022-07-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.