Literature DB >> 17874592

Test-induced priming of false memories.

Elizabeth J Marsh1, Patrick O Dolan.   

Abstract

Of interest was whether prior testing of related words primes false memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. After studying lists of related words, subjects made old-new judgments about zero, three, or six related items before being tested on critical nonpresented lures. When the recognition test was self-paced, prior testing of list items led to faster false recognition judgments, but did not increase the rate of false alarms to lures from studied lists. Critically, this pattern changed when decision making at test was speeded. When forced to respond quickly--presumably precluding the use of monitoring processes--clear test-induced priming effects were observed in the rate of false memories. The results are consistent with an activation-monitoring explanation of false memories and support that retrieving veridical memories can be a source of memory error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17874592     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

1.  The case against a criterion-shift account of false memory.

Authors:  J T Wixted; V Stretch
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Norms for word lists that create false memories.

Authors:  M A Stadler; H L Roediger; K B McDermott
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

3.  Strategic processes in false recognition memory.

Authors:  Evan Heit; Noellie Brockdorff; Koen Lamberts
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

4.  Does test-induced priming play a role in the creation of false memories?

Authors:  Elizabeth J Marsh; Kathleen B McDermott; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2004-01

5.  The role of rehearsal and generation in false memory creation.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Marsh; Gordon H Bower
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2004-11

6.  Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition.

Authors:  Michael D Dodd; Erin D Sheard; Colin M MacLeod
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2006-01

7.  Speeded retrieval abolishes the false-memory suppression effect: evidence for the distinctiveness heuristic.

Authors:  Chad S Dodson; Amanda C G Hege
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-08

8.  Distinctiveness and the recognition mirror effect: evidence for an item-based criterion placement heuristic.

Authors:  Ian G Dobbins; Neal E A Kroll
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-10

10.  On the dual effects of repetition on false recognition.

Authors:  A S Benjamin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  3 in total

1.  Dynamics of thematic activation in recognition testing.

Authors:  Daniel R Kimball; William J Muntean; Troy A Smith
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

2.  A memory-interference versus the "dud"-effect account of a DRM false memory result: Fewer related targets at test, higher critical-lure false recognition.

Authors:  Jerwen Jou; Mark Hwang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-03-22

3.  On the adaptive function of children's and adults' false memories.

Authors:  Mark L Howe; Samantha Wilkinson; Sarah R Garner; Linden J Ball
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2015-07-31
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.