Literature DB >> 16423748

Re-exposure to studied items at test does not influence false recognition.

Michael D Dodd1, Erin D Sheard, Colin M MacLeod.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we investigated whether re-exposure to previously studied items at test affects false recognition in the DRM paradigm. Furthermore, we examined whether exposure to the critical lure at test influences memory for subsequently presented study items. In Experiment 1, immediately following each studied DRM list, participants were given a recognition test. The tests were constructed such that the number of studied items preceding the critical lure varied from zero to five. Neither false recognition for critical lures nor accurate memory for studied items was affected by this manipulation. In Experiment 2, we replicated this pattern of results under speeded conditions at test. Both experiments confirm that exposure to previously studied items at test does not affect true or false recognition in the DRM paradigm. This pattern strongly suggests that retrieval processes do not influence false recognition in the DRM paradigm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16423748     DOI: 10.1080/09658210444000575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Memory        ISSN: 0965-8211


  7 in total

1.  The modality effect in false recognition: evidence for test-based monitoring.

Authors:  Benton H Pierce; David A Gallo; Jonathan A Weiss; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-12

2.  The role of test structure in creating false memories.

Authors:  Jennifer H Coane; Dawn M McBride
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

3.  Comparing decay rates for accurate and false memories in the DRM paradigm.

Authors:  Jorie M Colbertr; Dawn M McBride
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-10

4.  Semantic and repetition priming effects for Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) critical items and associates produced by DRM and unrelated study lists.

Authors:  Chi-Shing Tse; James H Neely
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

5.  Test-induced priming of false memories.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Marsh; Patrick O Dolan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

6.  Dynamics of thematic activation in recognition testing.

Authors:  Daniel R Kimball; William J Muntean; Troy A Smith
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

7.  A memory-interference versus the "dud"-effect account of a DRM false memory result: Fewer related targets at test, higher critical-lure false recognition.

Authors:  Jerwen Jou; Mark Hwang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-03-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.