GOAL: The benefit of supportive care with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) for patients with cancer-related anaemia is well known. However, the European Cancer Anaemia Survey (ECAS, data from 2001) showed that about 60% of cancer patients with anaemia do not receive any treatment. Since ECAS, evidence-based guidelines have provided recommendations for ESA use, but it is not known to what extent current treatment patterns follow these guidelines. To address this issue, the Anaemia Cancer Treatment (A.C.T.) study was initiated. The background to the development of the A.C.T. study and study methodology are described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The A.C.T. study is a global, retrospective, pharmacoepidemiologic study of at least 2,560 medical records of anaemic patients with cancer who were previously treated with an ESA from a minimum of 186 centres. Records from patients aged greater than or equal to 18 years with a diagnosis of solid tumour or myeloma or lymphoma and who were started on ESAs 3-12 months before inclusion and followed for 8-10 weeks will be eligible. Factors associated with ESA non-responsiveness will also be evaluated. MAIN RESULTS: Completion of the European phase of the study is anticipated in late 2007 with the rest of the world closing in late 2007 or early 2008. Publication of findings is anticipated in 2008. CONCLUSIONS: By examining the extent to which anaemia management in clinical practice is congruent with best practice guidelines, the A.C.T. study will provide a further foundation for the development of evidence-based supportive cancer care.
GOAL: The benefit of supportive care with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) for patients with cancer-related anaemia is well known. However, the European Cancer Anaemia Survey (ECAS, data from 2001) showed that about 60% of cancerpatients with anaemia do not receive any treatment. Since ECAS, evidence-based guidelines have provided recommendations for ESA use, but it is not known to what extent current treatment patterns follow these guidelines. To address this issue, the Anaemia Cancer Treatment (A.C.T.) study was initiated. The background to the development of the A.C.T. study and study methodology are described. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The A.C.T. study is a global, retrospective, pharmacoepidemiologic study of at least 2,560 medical records of anaemic patients with cancer who were previously treated with an ESA from a minimum of 186 centres. Records from patients aged greater than or equal to 18 years with a diagnosis of solid tumour or myeloma or lymphoma and who were started on ESAs 3-12 months before inclusion and followed for 8-10 weeks will be eligible. Factors associated with ESA non-responsiveness will also be evaluated. MAIN RESULTS: Completion of the European phase of the study is anticipated in late 2007 with the rest of the world closing in late 2007 or early 2008. Publication of findings is anticipated in 2008. CONCLUSIONS: By examining the extent to which anaemia management in clinical practice is congruent with best practice guidelines, the A.C.T. study will provide a further foundation for the development of evidence-based supportive cancer care.
Authors: R Turner; P Anglin; R Burkes; F Couture; W Evans; G Goss; R Grimshaw; B Melosky; A Paterson; I Quirt Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: C Bokemeyer; M S Aapro; A Courdi; J Foubert; H Link; A Osterborg; L Repetto; P Soubeyran Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2006-12-19 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: G A Curt; W Breitbart; D Cella; J E Groopman; S J Horning; L M Itri; D H Johnson; C Miaskowski; S L Scherr; R K Portenoy; N J Vogelzang Journal: Oncologist Date: 2000
Authors: Gunnar Birgegård; Matti S Aapro; Carsten Bokemeyer; Mario Dicato; Peter Drings; Javier Hornedo; Maciej Krzakowski; Heinz Ludwig; Sergio Pecorelli; Hans Schmoll; Maurice Schneider; Dirk Schrijvers; Daniel Shasha; Simon Van Belle Journal: Oncology Date: 2005 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: Arash Naeim; Lyssa Friedman; Kimberly B Whitlock; David J Pasta; Eric P Elkin; Deborah P Lubeck; Hema N Viswanathan; John Glaspy Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: J L Steegmann; J M Sánchez Torres; R Colomer; Á Vaz; J López; I Jalón; M Provencio; A González-Martín; M Pérez Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: James Granfortuna; Kaye Shoffner; Stephen E DePasquale; Sejal Badre; Chet Bohac; Cisio De Oliveira Brandao Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 3.603