Literature DB >> 17873257

Are patient decision aids the best way to improve clinical decision making? Report of the IPDAS Symposium.

Margaret Holmes-Rovner1, Wendy L Nelson, Michael Pignone, Glyn Elwyn, David R Rovner, Annette M O'Connor, Angela Coulter, Rosaly Correa-de-Araujo.   

Abstract

This article reports on the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Symposium held in 2006 at the annual meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making in Cambridge, Massachusetts. The symposium featured a debate regarding the proposition that "decision aids are the best way to improve clinical decision making.'' The formal debate addressed the theoretical problem of the appropriate gold standard for an improved decision, efficacy of decision aids, and prospects for implementation. Audience comments and questions focused on both theory and practice: the often unacknowledged roots of decision aids in expected utility theory and the practical problems of limited patient decision aid implementation in health care. The participants' vote on the proposition was approximately half for and half against.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17873257     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07307272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  20 in total

1.  Extending the P4P agenda, part 1: how Medicare can improve patient decision making and reduce unnecessary care.

Authors:  John E Wennberg; Annette M O'Connor; E Dale Collins; James N Weinstein
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Impact of a Multifaceted Intervention on Promoting Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy Among Persons in HIV Primary Care: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Pansy Ferron; Shihab S Asfour; Lisa R Metsch; Michael H Antoni; Allan E Rodriguez; Robert Duncan; Sheila M Findlay
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 4.689

3.  A theory-based decision aid for patients with cancer: results of feasibility and acceptability testing of DecisionKEYS for cancer.

Authors:  Patricia J Hollen; Richard J Gralla; Randy A Jones; Christopher Y Thomas; David R Brenin; Geoffrey R Weiss; Anneke T Schroen; Gina R Petroni
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Palliative medicine and decision science: the critical need for a shared agenda to foster informed patient choice in serious illness.

Authors:  Marie Bakitas; Jennifer Kryworuchko; Dan D Matlock; Angelo E Volandes
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  What is a good medical decision? A research agenda guided by perspectives from multiple stakeholders.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Sarah E Lillie; Dana L Alden; Laura Scherer; Megan Oser; Christine Rini; Miho Tanaka; John Baleix; Mikki Brewster; Simon Craddock Lee; Mary K Goldstein; Robert M Jacobson; Ronald E Myers; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Erika A Waters
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-08-26

6.  Development of an interactive computer program for advance care planning.

Authors:  Michael J Green; Benjamin H Levi
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Do haematological cancer patients get the information they need about their cancer and its treatment? Results of a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Rochelle Watson; Jamie Bryant; Robert Sanson-Fisher; Heidi Turon; Lisa Hyde; Anne Herrmann
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi).

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Annette M O'Connor; Carol Bennett; Robert G Newcombe; Mary Politi; Marie-Anne Durand; Elizabeth Drake; Natalie Joseph-Williams; Sara Khangura; Anton Saarimaki; Stephanie Sivell; Mareike Stiel; Steven J Bernstein; Nananda Col; Angela Coulter; Karen Eden; Martin Härter; Margaret Holmes Rovner; Nora Moumjid; Dawn Stacey; Richard Thomson; Tim Whelan; Trudy van der Weijden; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Design and development of a decision aid to enhance shared decision making by patients with an asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Dirk T Ubbink; Anouk M Knops; Sjaak Molenaar; Astrid Goossens
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Translating comparative effectiveness of depression medications into practice by comparing the depression medication choice decision aid to usual care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Annie LeBlanc; Amy E Bodde; Megan E Branda; Kathleen J Yost; Jeph Herrin; Mark D Williams; Nilay D Shah; Holly Van Houten; Kari L Ruud; Laurie J Pencille; Victor M Montori
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.