Literature DB >> 1787247

Risk factors for hearing loss at different frequencies in a population of 47,388 noise-exposed workers.

P Bauer1, K Körpert, M Neuberger, A Raber, F Schwetz.   

Abstract

Weighted regression analysis was applied to determine the dependence of the hearing thresholds of 47,388 noise-exposed workers on age, sex, noise immission level, ear disease, head injury, tinnitus, hearing protector usage, and audiometric frequency in the range from 0.5 to 6 kHz. It could be shown that the hearing thresholds at any frequency are dominated by the age of the worker and that women, after equivalent exposure conditions, hear better than men. The relative effects of sex, noise immission level, ear diseases, tinnitus, and hearing protector usage are related to the audiometric frequency. Users of hearing protectors at the last audiometric investigation hear worse than nonusers. Hearing protector usage is strongly related with the hearing threshold in the low-frequency range. The noise immission level does not noticeably affect the hearing threshold below 3 kHz. The most important frequency of the noise immission level is as expected 4 kHz. For 4 kHz, it was shown that the variables age, noise immission level, tinnitus, head injuries, and ear diseases act in a good approximation additively on the pure-tone hearing threshold.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1787247     DOI: 10.1121/1.401418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Surveillance of noise exposure in the Danish workplace: a baseline survey.

Authors:  S Kock; T Andersen; H A Kolstad; B Kofoed-Nielsen; F Wiesler; J P Bonde
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  A retrospective analysis of noise-induced hearing loss in the Dutch construction industry.

Authors:  M C J Leensen; J C van Duivenbooden; W A Dreschler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Sensorineural hearing loss of noise in members of aviation club of Larissa (Greece).

Authors:  E Gerostergiou; I Tsitiridis; D Batzakakis; G Limpanovnou; I Vathilakis; V Sandris
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.471

4.  Epidemiological characteristics of hearing loss associated with noise temporal structure among manufacturing workers.

Authors:  Lifang Zhou; Xiaoying Ruan; Tongshuai Wang; Hongwei Xie; Yong Hu; Zhihao Shi; Jiarui Xin; Jiena Zhou; Panqi Xue; Fang Wei; Yixin Zhang; Meibian Zhang; Hua Zou
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-08

5.  Assessment of impulse noise level and acoustic trauma in military personnel.

Authors:  Maryam Rezaee; Mohammad Mojtahed; Mohammad Ghasemi; Babak Saedi
Journal:  Trauma Mon       Date:  2012-01-15

6.  The effect of childhood infection on hearing function at age 61 to 63 years in the newcastle thousand families study.

Authors:  Fiona Pearson; Kay D Mann; Adrian Rees; Adrian Davis; Mark S Pearce
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 7.  Occupational noise exposure and hearing: a systematic review.

Authors:  Arve Lie; Marit Skogstad; Håkon A Johannessen; Tore Tynes; Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum; Karl-Christian Nordby; Bo Engdahl; Kristian Tambs
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Occupational noise-induced hearing loss in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiena Zhou; Zhihao Shi; Lifang Zhou; Yong Hu; Meibian Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Occupational Hearing Loss Associated With Non-Gaussian Noise: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhihao Shi; Jiena Zhou; Yuwen Huang; Yong Hu; Lifang Zhou; Yongqiang Shao; Meibian Zhang
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 3.570

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.