Chuck Norlin1, Adam L Sharp, Sean D Firth. 1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA. chuck.norlin@hsc.utah.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To identify the frequency, types, and perceived importance of questions prompted during primary care visits for which pediatricians have no ready answer; to characterize pediatricians' responses to them; and to determine how questions prompted while caring for children with special health care needs (CSHCN) and children without special needs (Cw/oSN) differ. METHODS: Patient visits with 35 general pediatricians were observed. Parents completed a CSHCN screener. Physicians provided details about their unanswered questions and their pursuit of answers. RESULTS: Of 890 observed visits, 170 (19.1%) prompted unanswered questions, of which 60.1% were deemed important or very important. Physicians intended to pursue answers to 49.7% of the questions but actually pursued answers for only 27.5%, citing lack of time and inadequate information resources as barriers. One hundred sixty-seven (18.8%) visits were with CSHCN. Unanswered questions arose more often with CSHCN than with Cw/oSN (28.7% vs 16.9%; odds ratio 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.97), particularly during well visits (34.6% vs 14.9%; odds ratio 3.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.59-6.39). CSHCN prompted more diagnosis and treatment questions than Cw/oSN. Questions prompted by CSHCN were ranked as more important but were no more likely to be pursued than those prompted by Cw/oSN. CONCLUSIONS: Unanswered questions arise during nearly 20% of pediatric primary care visits. Visits with CSHCN, particularly well visits, generate more questions than those with Cw/oSN. Answers are pursued for few unanswered questions, both overall and for CSHCN. Potential strategies to overcome barriers to answering questions include scheduling more time or more visits for CSHCN.
OBJECTIVES: To identify the frequency, types, and perceived importance of questions prompted during primary care visits for which pediatricians have no ready answer; to characterize pediatricians' responses to them; and to determine how questions prompted while caring for children with special health care needs (CSHCN) and children without special needs (Cw/oSN) differ. METHODS:Patient visits with 35 general pediatricians were observed. Parents completed a CSHCN screener. Physicians provided details about their unanswered questions and their pursuit of answers. RESULTS: Of 890 observed visits, 170 (19.1%) prompted unanswered questions, of which 60.1% were deemed important or very important. Physicians intended to pursue answers to 49.7% of the questions but actually pursued answers for only 27.5%, citing lack of time and inadequate information resources as barriers. One hundred sixty-seven (18.8%) visits were with CSHCN. Unanswered questions arose more often with CSHCN than with Cw/oSN (28.7% vs 16.9%; odds ratio 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.97), particularly during well visits (34.6% vs 14.9%; odds ratio 3.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.59-6.39). CSHCN prompted more diagnosis and treatment questions than Cw/oSN. Questions prompted by CSHCN were ranked as more important but were no more likely to be pursued than those prompted by Cw/oSN. CONCLUSIONS: Unanswered questions arise during nearly 20% of pediatric primary care visits. Visits with CSHCN, particularly well visits, generate more questions than those with Cw/oSN. Answers are pursued for few unanswered questions, both overall and for CSHCN. Potential strategies to overcome barriers to answering questions include scheduling more time or more visits for CSHCN.
Authors: Salimah Z Shariff; Jessica M Sontrop; R Brian Haynes; Arthur V Iansavichus; K Ann McKibbon; Nancy L Wilczynski; Matthew A Weir; Mark R Speechley; Amardeep Thind; Amit X Garg Journal: CMAJ Date: 2012-01-16 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Salimah Z Shariff; Meaghan S Cuerden; R Brian Haynes; K Ann McKibbon; Nancy L Wilczynski; Arthur V Iansavichus; Mark R Speechley; Amardeep Thind; Amit X Garg Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2010-07-20 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Guilherme Del Fiol; Peter J Haug; James J Cimino; Scott P Narus; Chuck Norlin; Joyce A Mitchell Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2008-08-28 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Farifteh F Duffy; Laura J Fochtmann; Diana E Clarke; Keila Barber; Seung-Hee Hong; Joel Yager; Eve K Mościcki; Robert M Plovnick Journal: Psychiatr Q Date: 2016-09
Authors: Salimah Z Shariff; Shayna Ad Bejaimal; Jessica M Sontrop; Arthur V Iansavichus; R Brian Haynes; Matthew A Weir; Amit X Garg Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 5.428