Literature DB >> 17868350

The use of questions to determine the presence of photophobia and phonophobia during migraine.

Randolph W Evans1, Tad Seifert, Jayasree Kailasam, Ninan T Mathew.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the use of more detailed close-ended questions as part of the routine headache history is helpful when patients initially deny that they are sensitive to light and noise during migraine headaches.
BACKGROUND: According to the International Headache Society 2004 criteria, the diagnosis of migraine requires the presence of at least one of the following during a headache: (1) nausea and/or vomiting, (2) photophobia and phonophobia. Evans anecdotally noted that many patients answer the question, "does light or noise bother you during a headache," with a "no" when the answer is really "yes" if they are asked more detailed close-ended questions.
METHODS: Consecutive patients fulfilling International Headache Society 2004 criteria for migraine or probable migraine presenting to a headache clinic and a neurology clinic were asked the following questions: "does light bother you during a headache?" If "no," they were then asked, "during a headache, would you prefer to be in bright sunlight or in a dark room?""does noise bother you during a headache?" If "no," they were then asked, "during a headache, would you prefer to be in a room with loud music or in a quiet room?"
RESULTS: Eighty-five consecutive patients with migraine or probable migraine were questioned, 71 females (83.5%) and 14 males (16.5%). There was denial of light and sound sensitivity in 24% of patients with routine questioning and then awareness of sensitivity in 93% with the further questioning. A total of 7.1% of the patients were diagnosed with probable migraine. However, if the additional questions were not asked, 8% more of the patients with definite migraine would have been incorrectly diagnosed as probable migraine.
CONCLUSION: When patients initially deny light and noise sensitivity during migraine headaches, additional questions should be asked to ensure that their answer is accurate. Not asking the additional questions may result in the over-diagnosis of probable migraine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17868350     DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00920.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Headache        ISSN: 0017-8748            Impact factor:   5.887


  6 in total

Review 1.  Photophobia: When Light Hurts, a Review.

Authors:  Abdul Albilali; Esma Dilli
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Thin-film optical notch filter spectacle coatings for the treatment of migraine and photophobia.

Authors:  Ryan N Hoggan; Amith Subhash; Steve Blair; Kathleen B Digre; Susan K Baggaley; Jamison Gordon; K C Brennan; Judith E A Warner; Alison V Crum; Bradley J Katz
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 1.961

Review 3.  Photophobia in neurologic disorders.

Authors:  Yiwen Wu; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Transl Neurodegener       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 8.014

Review 4.  A rational approach to migraine diagnosis and management in primary care.

Authors:  Vincent T Martin; Alexander Feoktistov; Glen D Solomon
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 4.709

Review 5.  Pathophysiology and Therapy of Associated Features of Migraine.

Authors:  Maria Dolores Villar-Martinez; Peter J Goadsby
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 7.666

6.  Diagnosing migraine in research and clinical settings: the validation of the Structured Migraine Interview (SMI).

Authors:  Zainab Samaan; E Anne Macgregor; Dowson Andrew; Peter McGuffin; Anne Farmer
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 2.474

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.