Literature DB >> 17868108

Er:YAG laser osteotomy for removal of impacted teeth: clinical comparison of two techniques.

Stefan Stübinger1, vet Brigitte von Rechenberg, Hans-Florian Zeilhofer, Robert Sader, Constantin Landes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In contrast to many techniques currently employed for osteotomy, like saws, drills or modulated ultrasound, lasers offer non-contact and low-vibration bone cutting. Therefore, this report examines the benefits to laser osteotomy in oral surgery using two different short-pulsed Er:YAG laser systems.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Er:YAG lasers, using either a fiber-optic delivery system and an articulated arm delivery system, were used to remove impacted teeth in 30 patients. In 15 patients an Er:YAG laser utilizing a fiber-optic delivery system was applied for cutting bone, with a pulse energy of 500 mJ, a pulse duration of 250 microseconds and frequency of 12 Hz (energy density 177 J/cm(2)). The other 15 patients were treated with an Er:YAG laser utilizing an articulated arm delivery system, with a pulse energy of 1,000 mJ, a pulse duration of 300 microseconds and a frequency of 12 Hz (energy density 157 J/cm(2)).
RESULTS: In all cases the lasers allowed precise bone ablation without any visible, negative, thermal side-effects. Since the laser tip was used in a non-contact mode and could be positioned freely, unrestricted cut geometries were feasible. Adjacent soft tissue structures could be preserved and were not harmed by the laser beam. However, osteotomies were time consuming, especially if teeth had to be separated. The level of water irrigation limited the use of the laser. In 20% of the cases in which the articulated arm delivery laser was used to section teeth, it was necessary to use a conventional dental drill to finish the procedure.
CONCLUSION: This bone ablation technique, using short Er:YAG laser pulses and water spray, produced good clinical results without any impairment to wound healing. However, for now, the lack of depth control and the time required to perform the necessary osteotomy limit routine clinical application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17868108     DOI: 10.1002/lsm.20528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Surg Med        ISSN: 0196-8092            Impact factor:   4.025


  8 in total

1.  A report on the use of Er:YAG laser for pilot hole drilling prior to miniscrew insertion.

Authors:  Fulya Ozdemir; Hande Biceroglu Demir; Mehmet Oguz Oztoprak; Murat Tozlu
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis: laser-assisted surgical treatment or conventional surgery?

Authors:  Belir Atalay; Serhat Yalcin; Yusuf Emes; Irem Aktas; Buket Aybar; Halim Issever; Nil Molinas Mandel; Ozge Cetin; Bora Oncu
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Laser vs bur for bone cutting in impacted mandibular third molar surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Deepak Passi; Uma Shankar Pal; Shadab Mohammad; Rakesh Kumar Singh; Divya Mehrotra; Geeta Singh; Manoj Kumar; Arul A L Chellappa; Chandan Gupta
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2013-04-06

4.  Ablation of porcine bone tissue with an ultrashort pulsed laser (USPL) system.

Authors:  Christina Plötz; Florian Schelle; Christoph Bourauel; Matthias Frentzen; Jörg Meister
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Comparison of the efficiency of arm force versus arm force plus wrist movement in closed method extractions an observational study.

Authors:  Prashanth Sundaram; Saravanan Kandasamy; Reena Rachel John; K C Keerthana Sri
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-07-15

6.  Flexible delivery of Er:YAG radiation at 2.94 µm with negative curvature silica glass fibers: a new solution for minimally invasive surgical procedures.

Authors:  A Urich; R R J Maier; Fei Yu; J C Knight; D P Hand; J D Shephard
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Efficiency of Laser versus Bur in Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: An Original Research.

Authors:  Niladri Maiti; Piyush Sharma; Samiksha Singh Jadon; Fida Qadri; V R Chandra Babu Pamidi; Sagar Ramesh Ganvir; Rahul V C Tiwari
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

8.  Advances in bone surgery: the Er:YAG laser in oral surgery and implant dentistry.

Authors:  Stefan Stübinger
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2010-06-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.