Literature DB >> 17868060

Dissociation of depletional induction and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease in kidney recipients treated with alemtuzumab.

A D Kirk1, W S Cherikh, M Ring, G Burke, D Kaufman, S J Knechtle, S Potdar, R Shapiro, V R Dharnidharka, H M Kauffman.   

Abstract

Transplant patients are at the risk for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), a virally-driven malignancy. Induction with the depleting antibody preparations Thymoglobulin and OKT3 is associated with PTLD suggesting that the T-cell depletion increases PTLD risk. We therefore studied 59 560 kidney recipients from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) database for a relationship between induction agent use and PTLD. Two agents with comparable T-cell depletional effects, alemtuzumab and Thymoglobulin, were compared to nondepletional induction agents or no induction. The overall incidence of PTLD was 0.46% and differed significantly by induction strategy (p < 0.01): without induction (0.43%), basiliximab (0.38%), daclizumab (0.33%), Thymoglobulin (0.67%) and alemtuzumab (0.37%). Thymoglobulin was associated with significantly increased PTLD risk (p = 0.0025), but alemtuzumab (p = 0.74), basiliximab (p = 0.33) and daclizumab, which trended toward a protective effect (p = 0.06), were not. Alemtuzumab and Thymoglobulin treated patients did not differ in any established parameter affecting PTLD risk although alemtuzumab is known to have a more pronounced B-cell depleting effect. Interestingly, maintenance therapy with an mTOR inhibitor was strongly associated with PTLD (0.71%, p < 0.0001). Thus, depletional induction is not an independent risk factor for PTLD. Rather, maintenance drug selection or perhaps the balance between B- and T-cell depletion may be more relevant determinants of PTLD risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17868060      PMCID: PMC2778321          DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01972.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  18 in total

1.  Immunosuppression: evolution in practice and trends, 1993-2003.

Authors:  Ron Shapiro; James B Young; Edgar L Milford; James F Trotter; Rami T Bustami; Alan B Leichtman
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.086

2.  Immunocompetent T-cells with a memory-like phenotype are the dominant cell type following antibody-mediated T-cell depletion.

Authors:  Jonathan P Pearl; Jeremy Parris; Douglas A Hale; Steven C Hoffmann; Wendy B Bernstein; Kelly L McCoy; S John Swanson; Roslyn B Mannon; Mario Roederer; Allan D Kirk
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 8.086

3.  Effect of anti-lymphocyte induction therapy on renal allograft survival: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  L A Szczech; J A Berlin; S Aradhye; R A Grossman; H I Feldman
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 10.121

4.  The effect of antilymphocyte induction therapy on renal allograft survival. A meta-analysis of individual patient-level data. Anti-Lymphocyte Antibody Induction Therapy Study Group.

Authors:  L A Szczech; J A Berlin; H I Feldman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Campath IH allows low-dose cyclosporine monotherapy in 31 cadaveric renal allograft recipients.

Authors:  R Calne; S D Moffatt; P J Friend; N V Jamieson; J A Bradley; G Hale; J Firth; J Bradley; K G Smith; H Waldmann
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-11-27       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Results from a human renal allograft tolerance trial evaluating the humanized CD52-specific monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab (CAMPATH-1H).

Authors:  Allan D Kirk; Douglas A Hale; Roslyn B Mannon; David E Kleiner; Steven C Hoffmann; Robert L Kampen; Linda K Cendales; Douglas K Tadaki; David M Harlan; S John Swanson
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  The use of Campath-1H as induction therapy in renal transplantation: preliminary results.

Authors:  Gaetano Ciancio; George W Burke; Jeffrey J Gaynor; Adela Mattiazzi; Ramin Roohipour; Manuel R Carreno; David Roth; Phillip Ruiz; Warren Kupin; Anne Rosen; Violet Esquenazi; Andreas G Tzakis; Joshua Miller
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Campath-1H in renal transplantation: The University of Wisconsin experience.

Authors:  Stuart J Knechtle; Luis A Fernandez; John D Pirsch; Bryan N Becker; L Thomas Chin; Yolanda T Becker; Jon S Odorico; Anthony M D'alessandro; Hans W Sollinger
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Treatment of PTLD with rituximab or chemotherapy.

Authors:  R L Elstrom; C Andreadis; N A Aqui; V N Ahya; R D Bloom; S C Brozena; K M Olthoff; S J Schuster; S D Nasta; E A Stadtmauer; D E Tsai
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Association of the type of induction immunosuppression with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, graft survival, and patient survival after primary kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Wida S Cherikh; H M Kauffman; Maureen A McBride; Jude Maghirang; Lode J Swinnen; Douglas W Hanto
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  Lymphodepletional strategies in transplantation.

Authors:  Eugenia Page; Jean Kwun; Byoungchol Oh; Stuart Knechtle
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 2.  Immunosuppressive Medications.

Authors:  Alexander C Wiseman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 3.  Post-transplantation malignancies: here today, gone tomorrow?

Authors:  Edward K Geissler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 4.  Identification and therapeutic management of highly sensitized patients undergoing renal transplantation.

Authors:  Lu Huber; Nils Lachmann; Michael Dürr; Mareen Matz; Lutz Liefeldt; Hans-H Neumayer; Constanze Schönemann; Klemens Budde
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Impact of the posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder subtype on survival.

Authors:  Jean L Koff; Jing-Xia Li; Xinyan Zhang; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Christopher R Flowers; Edmund K Waller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (thymoglobulin): 25 years and new frontiers in solid organ transplantation and haematology.

Authors:  A Osama Gaber; Anthony P Monaco; James A Russell; Yvon Lebranchu; Mohamad Mohty
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Malignancy after renal transplantation: the role of immunosuppression.

Authors:  Inés Rama; Josep M Grinyó
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 8.  Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders following liver transplantation: Where are we now?

Authors:  Daan Dierickx; Nina Cardinaels
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Hepatocellular cancer and recurrence after liver transplantation: what about the impact of immunosuppression?

Authors:  Jan Lerut; Samuele Iesari; Maxime Foguenne; Quirino Lai
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-10-12

Review 10.  Calcineurin inhibitor sparing in paediatric solid organ transplantation : managing the efficacy/toxicity conundrum.

Authors:  J Michael Tredger; Nigel W Brown; Anil Dhawan
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.