Literature DB >> 14627905

Association of the type of induction immunosuppression with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, graft survival, and patient survival after primary kidney transplantation.

Wida S Cherikh1, H M Kauffman, Maureen A McBride, Jude Maghirang, Lode J Swinnen, Douglas W Hanto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of antilymphocyte antibodies for induction therapy or for treatment for rejection has been associated with an increased risk of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). The authors investigated the incidence of PTLD after monoclonal antilymphocyte, polyclonal antilymphocyte, interleukin (IL)-2 receptor antibody, or no induction therapy in primary kidney transplant recipients.
METHODS: A multivariate Cox analysis of 38,519 primary kidney transplants from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2000, was performed to compare the incidence of PTLD, graft survival, and patient survival among the induction groups.
RESULTS: The actual incidence of PTLD was 0.85% in 2,713 recipients with monoclonal, 0.81% in 4,343 with polyclonal, 0.50% in 7,800 with IL-2, and 0.51% in 23,663 recipients with no induction therapy (P=0.02). The Cox model indicated that as compared with no induction, the increased risk of PTLD was 72% with monoclonal (P=0.03), 29% with polyclonal (P=0.27), and 14% with IL-2 induction (P=0.52). IL-2 receptor antibody was associated with a 17% reduced risk of graft loss (P=0.002) and a 21% reduced risk of mortality (P=0.005) compared with no induction. Monoclonal and polyclonal induction therapies were not associated with a reduced risk of graft loss or mortality. Mycophenolate mofetil discharge maintenance immunosuppression was associated with a significantly reduced risk of PTLD and graft loss compared with azathioprine.
CONCLUSIONS: Among induction therapies, IL-2 receptor antibody induction was associated with the smallest risk of PTLD and improved graft and patient survival. Monoclonal or polyclonal induction was not associated with improved graft or patient survival, and monoclonal induction was associated with an increased risk of PTLD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14627905     DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000100826.58738.2B

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  43 in total

1.  Immune responses in transplantation: application to composite tissue allograft.

Authors:  Aleksandra Klimczak; Maria Siemionow
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder in living-donor liver transplantation: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Chikashi Nakanishi; Naoki Kawagishi; Satoshi Sekiguchi; Yorihiro Akamatsu; Kazushige Sato; Shigehito Miyagi; Ikuo Takeda; Daizo Fukushima; Yoshinobu Kobayashi; Kazuyuki Ishida; Hidetaka Niizuma; Shigeru Tsuchiya; Motoshi Wada; Masaki Nio; Susumu Satomi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Lymphodepletional strategies in transplantation.

Authors:  Eugenia Page; Jean Kwun; Byoungchol Oh; Stuart Knechtle
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 6.915

4.  Selective, efficient modulation of activated CD4+ αβT cells by the novel humanized antibody GZ-αβTCR targeting human αβTCR.

Authors:  G Blank; C Welker; J Haarer; M Sterk; S Nadalin; V A C Yañez; T O Joos; A Menrad; D Snell; G LaCorcia; A Königsrainer; R Handgretinger; K Schilbach
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 5.483

5.  De novo papillary carcinoma in a renal allograft: the pros and cons of immunosuppression.

Authors:  Rachelle Asciak; Jesmar Buttigieg; Louis Buhagiar
Journal:  CEN Case Rep       Date:  2015-11-02

Review 6.  Post-transplantation malignancies: here today, gone tomorrow?

Authors:  Edward K Geissler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Long-term cancer risk of immunosuppressive regimens after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Martin P Gallagher; Patrick J Kelly; Meg Jardine; Vlado Perkovic; Alan Cass; Jonathan C Craig; Josette Eris; Angela C Webster
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 8.  Identification and therapeutic management of highly sensitized patients undergoing renal transplantation.

Authors:  Lu Huber; Nils Lachmann; Michael Dürr; Mareen Matz; Lutz Liefeldt; Hans-H Neumayer; Constanze Schönemann; Klemens Budde
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  Renal transplantation in the elderly.

Authors:  Ramesh Saxena; Xueqing Yu; Mauricio Giraldo; Juan Arenas; Miguel Vazquez; Christopher Y Lu; Nosratola D Vaziri; Fred G Silva; Xin J Zhou
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Cyclosporin-A associated malignancy.

Authors:  Jonathan M Durnian; Rosalind M K Stewart; Richard Tatham; Mark Batterbury; Stephen B Kaye
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.