Literature DB >> 17867664

A critical assessment of the performance of protein-ligand scoring functions based on NMR chemical shift perturbations.

Bing Wang1, Lance M Westerhoff, Kenneth M Merz.   

Abstract

We have generated docking poses for the FKBP-GPI complex using eight docking programs, and compared their scoring functions with scoring based on NMR chemical shift perturbations (NMRScore). Because the chemical shift perturbation (CSP) is exquisitely sensitive on the orientation of the ligand inside the binding pocket, NMRScore offers an accurate and straightforward approach to score different poses. All scoring functions were inspected by their abilities to highly rank the native-like structures and separate them from decoy poses generated for a protein-ligand complex. The overall performance of NMRScore is much better than that of energy-based scoring functions associated with docking programs in both aspects. In summary, we find that the combination of docking programs with NMRScore results in an approach that can robustly determine the binding site structure for a protein-ligand complex, thereby providing a new tool facilitating the structure-based drug discovery process.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17867664      PMCID: PMC2525740          DOI: 10.1021/jm070484a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Chem        ISSN: 0022-2623            Impact factor:   7.446


  32 in total

1.  Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction.

Authors:  Renxiao Wang; Luhua Lai; Shaomeng Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 2.  Molecular recognition and docking algorithms.

Authors:  Natasja Brooijmans; Irwin D Kuntz
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  2003-01-28

Review 3.  High-throughput docking as a source of novel drug leads.

Authors:  Juan C Alvarez
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening.

Authors:  Thomas A Halgren; Robert B Murphy; Richard A Friesner; Hege S Beard; Leah L Frye; W Thomas Pollard; Jay L Banks
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy.

Authors:  Richard A Friesner; Jay L Banks; Robert B Murphy; Thomas A Halgren; Jasna J Klicic; Daniel T Mainz; Matthew P Repasky; Eric H Knoll; Mee Shelley; Jason K Perry; David E Shaw; Perry Francis; Peter S Shenkin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-03-25       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 6.  Virtual screening of chemical libraries.

Authors:  Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Computational approaches to molecular recognition.

Authors:  M L Lamb; W L Jorgensen
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes.

Authors:  M D Eldridge; C W Murray; T R Auton; G V Paolini; R P Mee
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Protein-ligand NOE matching: a high-throughput method for binding pose evaluation that does not require protein NMR resonance assignments.

Authors:  Keith L Constantine; Malcolm E Davis; William J Metzler; Luciano Mueller; Brian L Claus
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Fast semiempirical calculations for nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shifts: a divide-and-conquer approach.

Authors:  Bing Wang; Edward N Brothers; Arjan van der Vaart; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 3.488

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Application of NMR and molecular docking in structure-based drug discovery.

Authors:  Jaime L Stark; Robert Powers
Journal:  Top Curr Chem       Date:  2012

2.  Accurate macromolecular crystallographic refinement: incorporation of the linear scaling, semiempirical quantum-mechanics program DivCon into the PHENIX refinement package.

Authors:  Oleg Y Borbulevych; Joshua A Plumley; Roger I Martin; Kenneth M Merz; Lance M Westerhoff
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2014-04-26

3.  The Utility of the HSAB Principle via the Fukui Function in Biological Systems.

Authors:  John Faver; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 4.  Perspectives on NMR in drug discovery: a technique comes of age.

Authors:  Maurizio Pellecchia; Ivano Bertini; David Cowburn; Claudio Dalvit; Ernest Giralt; Wolfgang Jahnke; Thomas L James; Steve W Homans; Horst Kessler; Claudio Luchinat; Bernd Meyer; Hartmut Oschkinat; Jeff Peng; Harald Schwalbe; Gregg Siegal
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 84.694

5.  MovableType Software for Fast Free Energy-Based Virtual Screening: Protocol Development, Deployment, Validation, and Assessment.

Authors:  Zheng Zheng; Oleg Y Borbulevych; Hao Liu; Jianpeng Deng; Roger I Martin; Lance M Westerhoff
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  Using quantum mechanical approaches to study biological systems.

Authors:  Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 22.384

7.  Automated Fragmentation QM/MM Calculation of NMR Chemical Shifts for Protein-Ligand Complexes.

Authors:  Xinsheng Jin; Tong Zhu; John Z H Zhang; Xiao He
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 5.221

8.  High-throughput quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics (ONIOM) macromolecular crystallographic refinement with PHENIX/DivCon: the impact of mixed Hamiltonian methods on ligand and protein structure.

Authors:  Oleg Borbulevych; Roger I Martin; Lance M Westerhoff
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 7.652

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.