Literature DB >> 17852982

Patients retrieving additional information via the Internet: a trend analysis in a Swedish population, 2000-05.

Mikael Rahmqvist1, Ana-Claudia Bara.   

Abstract

AIMS: To examine the trends over five years for patients' seeking online additional health information about their disease/health problem to what the doctor has been giving, and investigate any differences in information-seeking behaviour according to age, gender, self-perceived health status, living area, and type of medical encounter.
METHODS: Data from three independent surveys conducted in 2000, 2002, and 2005 of a population with a recent experience of outpatient care[n]typesetter: please remove blue shading here and elsewhere[/n], including 24,800 respondents aged between 20 and 95, were analysed in a trend analysis and a logistic regression regarding background factors that may influence the seeking behaviour.
RESULTS: During the study period, there was a significant increase in Internet use in most age groups. The total use among men 20-95 years old increased from 7% in 2000 to 18% in 2005 and from 9% to 25% for women respectively. The predictors for using the Internet as a source of information were: age, gender, self-perceived health status, living area, and the type of medical encounter (first or repeated). In 2005, women aged 20-49 used the Internet as a source to a significantly greater extent than men, even when all background factors were controlled for (OR 1.46 and CI 1.21-1.77).
CONCLUSIONS: Swedish patients, especially the young and middle-aged, are to a substantial degree using the Internet to gather additional information on their disease. The benefits of this increase include more informed patients; however, there are inherent quality issues that require strategies for ensuring public access to high-quality health information online.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17852982     DOI: 10.1080/14034940701280750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Public Health        ISSN: 1403-4948            Impact factor:   3.021


  5 in total

1.  Does the quality, accuracy, and readability of information about lateral epicondylitis on the internet vary with the search term used?

Authors:  Christopher J Dy; Samuel A Taylor; Ronak M Patel; Moira M McCarthy; Timothy R Roberts; Aaron Daluiski
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2012-12

2.  Adapting the content of cancer web sites to the information needs of patients: reliability and readability.

Authors:  Ruben Alba-Ruiz; Clara Bermúdez-Tamayo; Jaime Jiménez Pernett; Jose Francisco Garcia-Gutierrez; José Manuel Cózar-Olmo; Beatriz Valero-Aguilera
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 3.536

3.  Comparison of consumer information on the internet to the current evidence base for minimally invasive parathyroidectomy.

Authors:  Timothy McLean; Leigh Delbridge
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Discrepancies between the internet and academic literature regarding vitamin use for male infertility.

Authors:  Mary K Samplaski; Chase G Clemesha
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-05

5.  Patients are doing it for themselves: A survey on disease-specific knowledge acquisition among people with Parkinson's disease in Sweden.

Authors:  Sara Riggare; Pär J Höglund; Helena Hvitfeldt Forsberg; Elena Eftimovska; Per Svenningsson; Maria Hägglund
Journal:  Health Informatics J       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 2.681

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.