Literature DB >> 17852212

The experience of men using an upper limb prosthesis following amputation: positive coping and minimizing feeling different.

Adam Saradjian1, Andrew R Thompson, Dipak Datta.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Psychosocial factors are likely to play a crucial role in adjustment to upper limb amputation and prosthesis use, and yet have received only minimal exploration within the literature. This study therefore, sought to gain a rich understanding of the experience of living with an upper limb amputation and of using a prosthetic arm and hand.
METHODS: The qualitative method of Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis was used. Purposive sampling culminated in a homogenous sample of 11 males with unilateral upper limb amputations, who wore a prosthesis at least weekly. Semi-structured interviews were carried out, transcribed and analysed according to the methodology.
RESULTS: Participants identified a theme of ongoing awareness of difference in appearance and ability. Consequently, participants described themes of psychosocial and functional adjustment to minimize this sense of difference. This was facilitated by the participants' prostheses and their positive coping style. Within this, participants also identified the personal meanings of their prosthesis and highlighted the terms of its use. The minimization of their sense of difference resulted in participants regaining a sense of worth.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings offer a greater psychological insight into adjustment from an upper limb amputation and the role of prostheses. These findings have implications for both the clinical rehabilitation of patients who undergo upper limb amputations, as well as for future research into the use and value of prostheses in facilitating the adjustment to this experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17852212     DOI: 10.1080/09638280701427386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  16 in total

Review 1.  Neural interfaces for somatosensory feedback: bringing life to a prosthesis.

Authors:  Dustin J Tyler
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.710

2.  Benefits of the Cybathlon 2020 experience for a prosthetic hand user: a case study on the Hannes system.

Authors:  Giulia Caserta; Nicolò Boccardo; Marco Freddolini; Giacinto Barresi; Andrea Marinelli; Michele Canepa; Samuel Stedman; Lorenzo Lombardi; Matteo Laffranchi; Emanuele Gruppioni; Lorenzo De Michieli
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 5.208

3.  Opinions of youngsters with congenital below-elbow deficiency, and those of their parents and professionals concerning prosthetic use and rehabilitation treatment.

Authors:  Ecaterina Vasluian; Ingrid G M de Jong; Wim G M Janssen; Margriet J Poelma; Iris van Wijk; Heleen A Reinders-Messelink; Corry K van der Sluis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Case-study of a user-driven prosthetic arm design: bionic hand versus customized body-powered technology in a highly demanding work environment.

Authors:  Wolf Schweitzer; Michael J Thali; David Egger
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Design and Development of a Novel Upper-Limb Cycling Prosthesis.

Authors:  Akira Tiele; Shivam Soni-Sadar; Jack Rowbottom; Shilen Patel; Edward Mathewson; Samuel Pearson; David Hutchins; John Head; Stephen Hutchins
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-16

6.  The influence of environment: Experiences of users of myoelectric arm prosthesis-a qualitative study.

Authors:  Cathrine Widehammar; Ingvor Pettersson; Gunnel Janeslätt; Liselotte Hermansson
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  User-relevant factors determining prosthesis choice in persons with major unilateral upper limb defects: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature and focus group results.

Authors:  Nienke Kerver; Sacha van Twillert; Bart Maas; Corry K van der Sluis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Replantation versus Prosthetic Fitting in Traumatic Arm Amputations: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Iris A Otto; Moshe Kon; Arnold H Schuurman; L Paul van Minnen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Discrimination and Recognition of Phantom Finger Sensation Through Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Mengnan Li; Dingguo Zhang; Yao Chen; Xinyu Chai; Longwen He; Ying Chen; Jinyao Guo; Xiaohong Sui
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Sociodemographic Determinants for the Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Vascular Amputations as Determined with the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire.

Authors:  José Vicente Benavent; José María Tenías; Ana Pellin; Jorge Casaña Mohedo; Ana Cristina Cabellos-García; Vicente Gea-Caballero
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.