Literature DB >> 17851868

Incidence and tumor characteristics of breast cancer diagnosed before and after implementation of a population-based screening-program.

Solveig Hofvind1, Ragnhild Sørum, Steinar Thoresen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials and service screening programs have shown that breast cancer screening reduces the mortality from the disease. Several years of monitoring are needed to prove such an effect. In the meantime attention should be paid to early surrogate measures, such as histopathological tumor characteristics. The Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program started November 1995. This study compares incidence, prognostic tumor characteristics and surgical treatment in breast cancer cases diagnosed in the pre-screening (1987-1995, n=2 618) and screening period (1996-2004, n=5 417), in women aged 50-69 years, residing in the first four counties implementing the screening program. The screening period is divided into those invited versus those not invited to the screening program, and those exposed (participants) versus those not exposed to the program (non-participants).
RESULTS: The incidence of invasive breast cancer rose from 170 per 100 000 women years (wy) in 1987 to 355 per 100 000 wy in 1997. The proportion of DCIS was 5% in the pre-screening period, and 14% in the screening period. Tumors 20 mm or less were diagnosed in 56% of the invasive cases in the pre-screening period, in 74% of the invited, and in 77% of the exposed women. The relative risk of diagnosing breast cancer with metastases was 0.85 (95% CI 0.84-0.87) for invited and 0.82 (95% CI 0.81-0.84) for exposed women, relative to those diagnosed in the pre-screening period. Ablation was performed in 85% of the invasive cases diagnosed in the pre-screening period, and in 45% of the cases in the screening period.
CONCLUSION: Breast cancer diagnosed in the screening period had prognostically favorable tumor characteristics compared to breast cancer diagnosed in the pre-screening period. Implementation of organized population based screening and the time trend are considered possible reasons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17851868     DOI: 10.1080/02841860701518041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  14 in total

1.  An investigation of the apparent breast cancer epidemic in France: screening and incidence trends in birth cohorts.

Authors:  Bernard Junod; Per-Henrik Zahl; Robert M Kaplan; Jørn Olsen; Sander Greenland
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.430

2.  Mammography, Martin Yaffe, and me: response and appreciation.

Authors:  Constantine Kaniklidis
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Performance of 4 years of population-based mammography screening for breast cancer combined with ultrasound in Tyrol / Austria.

Authors:  Sabine Geiger-Gritsch; Martin Daniaux; Wolfgang Buchberger; Rudolf Knapp; Willi Oberaigner
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Disparities in breast cancer mortality trends between 30 European countries: retrospective trend analysis of WHO mortality database.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol; Carlo La Vecchia; Carlo LaVecchia; Lars Vatten; Anna Gavin; Clarisse Héry; Mary Heanue
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-08-11

5.  Non-melanoma skin cancer incidence and impact of skin cancer screening on incidence.

Authors:  Nora Eisemann; Annika Waldmann; Alan C Geller; Martin A Weinstock; Beate Volkmer; Ruediger Greinert; Eckhard W Breitbart; Alexander Katalinic
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 8.551

6.  In vitro chemosensitivity testing of primary and recurrent breast carcinomas and its clinical significance.

Authors:  Zhi Li; Haiping Song; Wenshan He; Yuan Tian; Tao Huang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2008-12-24

7.  Skin cancer screening participation and impact on melanoma incidence in Germany--an observational study on incidence trends in regions with and without population-based screening.

Authors:  A Waldmann; S Nolte; M A Weinstock; E W Breitbart; N Eisemann; A C Geller; R Greinert; B Volkmer; A Katalinic
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  Advanced breast cancer incidence following population-based mammographic screening.

Authors:  P Autier; M Boniol; R Middleton; J F Doré; C Héry; T Zheng; A Gavin
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Breast cancer stromal elastosis is associated with mammography screening detection, low Ki67 expression and favourable prognosis in a population-based study.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Tor A Klingen; Elisabeth Wik; Hans Aas; Einar Vigeland; Knut Liestøl; Øystein Garred; Jan Mæhlen; Lars A Akslen; Jon Lømo
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.644

10.  High and intermediate grade ductal carcinoma in-situ of the breast: a comparison of pathologic features in core biopsies and excisions and an evaluation of core biopsy features that may predict a close or positive margin in the excision.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Nathan F Clement; Mohiedean Ghofrani
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.644

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.