Literature DB >> 1785099

Survivorship analysis of pedicle spinal instrumentation.

P C McAfee1, D J Weiland, J J Carlow.   

Abstract

Between 1985 and 1989, the senior author performed 120 consecutive pedicle instrumentation cases--78 Steffee (VSP) procedures and 42 procedures using Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Posterolateral or posterior fusions using autogenous iliac bone graft were performed across the instrumented vertebrae in all cases. Survivorship analysis was used to calculate a predicted cumulative rate of success for this series of patients over 10 years postoperative follow-up. The criteria of failure of pedicular instrumentation or "death" of an implant were defined as 1) screw bending, 2) screw breakage, 3) infection, 4) loosening of implants, 5) any rod or plate hardware problems, or 6) removal of hardware due to a neurologic complication. Out of 526 pedicle screws (175 Cotrel-Dubousset screws, 351 VSP screws) there were 22 problem screws (22/526 = 4.18%). Six screws had bent, none were infected, 16 screws had broken, and none were loose. The 22 problem screw events occurred in 12 patients. In seven patients, the instrumentation failure was an incidental radiographic finding, in that patients had a solid posterolateral fusion. The remaining five patients had screw breakage in association with a pseudarthrosis. Life table calculations predicted the survivorship of instrumentation without complications would be 80% at 10 years postoperative follow-up. Actuarial analysis predicted the survivorship of solid posterolateral fusion at 90% at 10 years follow-up. This survivorship rate is similar to those predicted at 10 years follow-up for other more widely used orthopedic surgical implants such as total hip arthroplasty components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1785099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  19 in total

1.  Effect of constrained posterior screw and rod systems for primary stability: biomechanical in vitro comparison of various instrumentations in a single-level corpectomy model.

Authors:  René Schmidt; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Lutz Claes; Wolfhart Puhl; Marcus Richter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Prospective study of a new dynamic stabilisation system in the treatment of degenerative discopathy and instability of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  A Zagra; L Minoia; M Archetti; A S Corriero; K Ricci; M Teli; F Giudici
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Mechanical implant failure in posterior cervical spine fusion.

Authors:  Takeshi Okamoto; Masashi Neo; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Hiromu Ito; Mitsuru Takemoto; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Biomechanical analysis of differing pedicle screw insertion angles.

Authors:  William Sterba; Do-Gyoon Kim; David P Fyhrie; Yener N Yeni; Rahul Vaidya
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Development and validation of a quantitative method to assess pedicle screw loosening in posterior spine instrumentation on plain radiographs.

Authors:  Emin Aghayev; Nicolas Zullig; Peter Diel; Daniel Dietrich; Lorin M Benneker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Lumbosacral arthrodesis using pedicular screws and ringed rods.

Authors:  J L Beguiristain; C Villas; R Preite; R Martinez; R H Barrios
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Short device fixation and early mobilization for burst fractures of the thoracolumbar junction.

Authors:  F de Peretti; I Hovorka; P M Cambas; J M Nasr; C Argenson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Stress analysis of the implants in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under static and vibration loadings: a comparison between pedicle screw fixation system with rigid and flexible rods.

Authors:  Wei Fan; Li-Xin Guo; Dan Zhao
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.896

9.  Role of 'low cost Indian implants' in our practice: our experience with 1,572 pedicle screws.

Authors:  Saurabh Rawall; Kapil Mohan; Premick Nagad; Ashutosh Sabnis; Uday Pawar; Abhay Nene
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Influence of a dynamic stabilisation system on load bearing of a bridged disc: an in vitro study of intradiscal pressure.

Authors:  W Schmoelz; J F Huber; T Nydegger; L Claes; H J Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.