Literature DB >> 17850240

Age effects to negative arousal differ for self-report and electrodermal activity.

Joachim Gavazzeni1, Stefan Wiens, Håkan Fischer.   

Abstract

Affective processing and emotional experience may change with age. Because findings of age differences in affective experiences are mixed even in studies using standardized stimuli, this study assessed age differences along gradual increases in negative arousal. Younger (20-30 years) and older (70-80 years) healthy adults (n=78) viewed 110 neutral to negative pictures (IAPS) while intensity ratings and electrodermal activity were recorded. Results showed that age had opposite effects on intensity ratings and electrodermal activity over gradual increases in normative arousal. Whereas older adults showed greater increases in intensity ratings than younger adults, they showed attenuated electrodermal activity, especially at high negative arousal. Because self-reports of arousal capture various aspects of affective processes (e.g., physiological changes as well as experience), effects of age may vary for these different aspects.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17850240     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00596.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  16 in total

1.  Error detection and error memory in spatial navigation as reflected by electrodermal activity.

Authors:  Lisa Holper; Natalie Jäger; Felix Scholkmann; Martin Wolf
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-05-23

2.  Negative arousal increases the effects of stimulus salience in older adults.

Authors:  Matthew R Sutherland; Mara Mather
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.645

3.  Aging is associated with positive responding to neutral information but reduced recovery from negative information.

Authors:  Carien M van Reekum; Stacey M Schaefer; Regina C Lapate; Catherine J Norris; Lawrence L Greischar; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Simultaneous measurement of electrodermal activity components correlated with age-related differences.

Authors:  Dindar S Bari; Haval Y Yacoob Aldosky; Ørjan G Martinsen
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 1.365

5.  Age differences in affective forecasting and experienced emotion surrounding the 2008 US presidential election.

Authors:  Susanne Scheibe; Rui Mata; Laura L Carstensen
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2011-06-01

6.  Methodological considerations in ambulatory skin conductance monitoring.

Authors:  Sigrun Doberenz; Walton T Roth; Eileen Wollburg; Nina I Maslowski; Sunyoung Kim
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Effects of hearing loss on heart rate variability and skin conductance measured during sentence recognition in noise.

Authors:  Carol L Mackersie; Imola X MacPhee; Emily W Heldt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Low Arousal Positive Emotional Stimuli Attenuate Aberrant Working Memory Processing in Persons with Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Lucas S Broster; Shonna L Jenkins; Sarah D Holmes; Gregory A Jicha; Yang Jiang
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.472

9.  Emotional Modulation of the Late Positive Potential during Picture Free Viewing in Older and Young Adults.

Authors:  Jenna B Renfroe; Margaret M Bradley; Christopher T Sege; Dawn Bowers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Superior recognition performance for happy masked and unmasked faces in both younger and older adults.

Authors:  Joakim Svärd; Stefan Wiens; Håkan Fischer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.