OBJECTIVE: To assess whether subtracting the expiratory change in intra-abdominal (bladder) pressure (Delta IAP) from central venous pressure (CVP) provides a reliable estimate of transmural CVP in spontaneously breathing patients with expiratory muscle activity. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational study in a medical ICU. PATIENTS: Twenty-four spontaneously breathing patients with central venous and bladder catheters: 18 with no clinical evidence of active expiration (group 1) and 6 with active expiration (group 2). INTERVENTIONS: Patients in group 1 were coached to change their breathing pattern to one of active expiration for several breaths; those in group 2 were asked to sip water through a straw to briefly interrupt active expiration. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: During active expiration end-expiratory CVP (uncorrected CVP) and Delta IAP were measured; Delta IAP was subtracted from uncorrected CVP to obtain corrected CVP. End-expiratory CVP during relaxed breathing (best CVP) was assumed to represent the best estimate of transmural CVP. The absolute difference between corrected CVP and best CVP was much less than the difference between uncorrected CVP and best CVP (2.3+/-2.0 vs. 12.5+/-4.7 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with active expiration, subtracting Delta IAP from end-expiratory CVP yields a more reliable (and lower) estimate of transmural CVP than does the uncorrected CVP value.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether subtracting the expiratory change in intra-abdominal (bladder) pressure (Delta IAP) from central venous pressure (CVP) provides a reliable estimate of transmural CVP in spontaneously breathing patients with expiratory muscle activity. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective observational study in a medical ICU. PATIENTS: Twenty-four spontaneously breathing patients with central venous and bladder catheters: 18 with no clinical evidence of active expiration (group 1) and 6 with active expiration (group 2). INTERVENTIONS:Patients in group 1 were coached to change their breathing pattern to one of active expiration for several breaths; those in group 2 were asked to sip water through a straw to briefly interrupt active expiration. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: During active expiration end-expiratory CVP (uncorrected CVP) and Delta IAP were measured; Delta IAP was subtracted from uncorrected CVP to obtain corrected CVP. End-expiratory CVP during relaxed breathing (best CVP) was assumed to represent the best estimate of transmural CVP. The absolute difference between corrected CVP and best CVP was much less than the difference between uncorrected CVP and best CVP (2.3+/-2.0 vs. 12.5+/-4.7 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with active expiration, subtracting Delta IAP from end-expiratory CVP yields a more reliable (and lower) estimate of transmural CVP than does the uncorrected CVP value.
Authors: S G Zakynthinos; T Vassilakopoulos; E Zakynthinos; C Roussos; G E Tzelepis Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: J L Teboul; M R Pinsky; A Mercat; N Anguel; G Bernardin; J M Achard; T Boulain; C Richard Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: R Phillip Dellinger; Jean M Carlet; Henry Masur; Herwig Gerlach; Thierry Calandra; Jonathan Cohen; Juan Gea-Banacloche; Didier Keh; John C Marshall; Margaret M Parker; Graham Ramsay; Janice L Zimmerman; Jean-Louis Vincent; M M Levy Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-03-03 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Massimo Antonelli; Elie Azoulay; Marc Bonten; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Citerio; Giorgio Conti; Daniel De Backer; François Lemaire; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Goran Hedenstierna; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Salvatore M Maggiore; Alexandre Mebazaa; Philipp Metnitz; Jerme Pugin; Jan Wernerman; Haibo Zhang Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: James W Leatherman; Christina Bastin-Dejong; Robert S Shapiro; Ramiro Saavedra-Romero Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-01-10 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Evelina Sturini; Andrea Saporito; Michael Sugrue; Michael J A Parr; Gillian Bishop; Antonio Braschi Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-05-24 Impact factor: 17.440