Literature DB >> 17848681

Three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopy of human prostate at 3 T without endorectal coil: feasibility.

Tom W J Scheenen1, Stijn W T P J Heijmink, Stefan A Roell, Christina A Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, Ben C Knipscheer, J Alfred Witjes, Jelle O Barentsz, Arend Heerschap.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate sensitivity and specificity of proton magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy of the prostate with external surface coil elements at 3 T for differentiation of cancer from healthy tissue within an acceptable measurement time, by using histopathologic findings as the reference standard.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was obtained. Forty-five men (age range, 51-70 years) underwent 3-T MR imaging with external radiofrequency surface coils for signal reception. MR spectroscopy was performed with acquisition-weighted three-dimensional water- and lipid-suppressed point-resolved spectroscopy pulse sequence. Voxels were classified into healthy peripheral zone, central gland, and periurethral zone and cancer tissue. Cancer voxels were classified according to cancer size and certainty in matching histopathologic findings with MR images. After visual inspection of automated fitting of classified voxels, the choline plus creatine-to-citrate (Cho + Cr/Cit) ratio was calculated for all tissues. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (A(z)) values were used to assess accuracy of discrimination of cancer from healthy tissues. P < .05 indicated a significant difference.
RESULTS: After exclusion of four patients with no voxels that passed visual inspection of the automated fit, a median of 82% of the classified voxels per patient was used in the analysis. Mean Cho + Cr/Cit ratios for healthy tissues were 0.22 +/- 0.12 (standard deviation) for peripheral zone, 0.34 +/- 0.14 for central gland, and 0.36 +/- 0.20 for periurethral area; all were significantly different from that of cancer (P < .001). A(z) for discrimination of probable and definite cancer tissue from healthy tissue for the peripheral zone (0.84) was significantly higher than that for the central gland (0.69) (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopy of the prostate, with a combination of only external radiofrequency surface coils at 3 T, can be used to discriminate cancer from healthy tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17848681     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2451061444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  33 in total

1.  Multiparametric MRI of the prostate at 3 T: limited value of 3D (1)H-MR spectroscopy as a fourth parameter.

Authors:  Stephan H Polanec; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Peter Brader; Dietmar Georg; Shahrokh Shariat; Claudio Spick; Martin Susani; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal A Baltzer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Evaluation of the ESUR PI-RADS scoring system for multiparametric MRI of the prostate with targeted MR/TRUS fusion-guided biopsy at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  M C Roethke; T H Kuru; S Schultze; D Tichy; A Kopp-Schneider; M Fenchel; H-P Schlemmer; B A Hadaschik
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Diagnostic value of semi-quantitative and quantitative analysis of functional parameters in multiparametric MRI of the prostate.

Authors:  Elke Hauth; Daniela Halbritter; Horst Jaeger; Horst Hohmuth; Meinrad Beer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Prostate 3T-MR spectroscopic imaging without an endorectal surface coil using the MLEV-PRESS sequence.

Authors:  Takeshi Yoshizako; Koji Uchida; Shinji Hara; Yasushi Kaji; Masahiro Sumura; Mikio Igawa; Hajime Kitagaki; Mitsuhiro Uike; Tsuyoshi Matsuda
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Multiparametric 3T prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect cancer: histopathological correlation using prostatectomy specimens processed in customized magnetic resonance imaging based molds.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Haresh Mani; Vijay Shah; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Marcelino Bernardo; Thomas Pohida; Yuxi Pang; Dagane Daar; Compton Benjamin; Yolanda L McKinney; Hari Trivedi; Celene Chua; Gennady Bratslavsky; Joanna H Shih; W Marston Linehan; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Amide proton transfer MR imaging of prostate cancer: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Guang Jia; Ronney Abaza; JoAnna D Williams; Debra L Zynger; Jinyuan Zhou; Zarine K Shah; Mitva Patel; Steffen Sammet; Lai Wei; Robert R Bahnson; Michael V Knopp
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in focal therapy for prostate cancer: recommendations from a consensus panel.

Authors:  Berrend G Muller; Jurgen J Fütterer; Rajan T Gupta; Aaron Katz; Alexander Kirkham; John Kurhanewicz; Judd W Moul; Peter A Pinto; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Cary Robertson; Jean de la Rosette; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; J Stephen Jones; Osamu Ukimura; Sadhna Verma; Hessel Wijkstra; Michael Marberger
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 8.  Combined magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin Umbehr; Lucas M Bachmann; Ulrike Held; Thomas M Kessler; Tullio Sulser; Dominik Weishaupt; John Kurhanewicz; Johann Steurer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  The aging effect on prostate metabolite concentrations measured by 1H MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Monika Dezortova; Filip Jiru; Antonin Skoch; Vaclav Capek; Zuzana Ryznarova; Viktor Vik; Milan Hajek
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 10.  Diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping and spectroscopy in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Jacobs; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Kyle Petrowski; Katarzyna J Macura
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.