Literature DB >> 17846996

TBX22 missense mutations found in patients with X-linked cleft palate affect DNA binding, sumoylation, and transcriptional repression.

Artemisia M Andreou1, Erwin Pauws, Marius C Jones, Manvendra K Singh, Markus Bussen, Kit Doudney, Gudrun E Moore, Andreas Kispert, Jan J Brosens, Philip Stanier.   

Abstract

The T-box transcription factor TBX22 is essential for normal craniofacial development, as demonstrated by the finding of nonsense, frameshift, splice-site, or missense mutations in patients with X-linked cleft palate (CPX) and ankyloglossia. To better understand the function of TBX22, we studied 10 different naturally occurring missense mutations that are phenotypically equivalent to loss-of-function alleles. Since all missense mutations are located in the DNA-binding T-box domain, we first investigated the preferred recognition sequence for TBX22. Typical of T-box proteins, the resulting sequence is a palindrome based around near-perfect copies of AGGTGTGA. DNA-binding assays indicate that missense mutations at or near predicted contact points with the DNA backbone compromise stable DNA-protein interactions. We show that TBX22 functions as a transcriptional repressor and that TBX22 missense mutations result in impaired repression activity. No effect on nuclear localization of TBX22 was observed. We find that TBX22 is a target for the small ubiquitin-like modifier SUMO-1 and that this modification is required for TBX22 repressor activity. Although the site of SUMO attachment at the lysine at position 63 is upstream of the T-box domain, loss of SUMO-1 modification is consistently found in all pathogenic CPX missense mutations. This implies a general mechanism linking the loss of SUMO conjugation to the loss of TBX22 function. Orofacial clefts are well known for their complex etiology and variable penetrance, involving both genetic and environmental risk factors. The sumoylation process is also subject to and profoundly affected by similar environmental stresses. Thus, we suggest that SUMO modification may represent a common pathway that regulates normal craniofacial development and is involved in the pathogenesis of both Mendelian and idiopathic forms of orofacial clefting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17846996      PMCID: PMC2227921          DOI: 10.1086/521033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  49 in total

1.  TBX22 mutations are a frequent cause of cleft palate.

Authors:  A C B Marçano; K Doudney; C Braybrook; R Squires; M A Patton; M M Lees; A Richieri-Costa; A C Lidral; J C Murray; G E Moore; P Stanier
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Cleft palate: players, pathways, and pursuits.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Murray; Brian C Schutte
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  SATB2 is a multifunctional determinant of craniofacial patterning and osteoblast differentiation.

Authors:  Gergana Dobreva; Maria Chahrour; Marcel Dautzenberg; Laura Chirivella; Benoit Kanzler; Isabel Fariñas; Gerard Karsenty; Rudolf Grosschedl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Modification of Msx1 by SUMO-1.

Authors:  Vandana Gupta; Marianna Bei
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  SUMO1 haploinsufficiency leads to cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Fowzan S Alkuraya; Irfan Saadi; Jennifer J Lund; Annick Turbe-Doan; Cynthia C Morton; Richard L Maas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Periconceptional health and lifestyle factors of both parents affect the risk of live-born children with orofacial clefts.

Authors:  Ingrid P C Krapels; Gerhard A Zielhuis; Fokaline Vroom; Lolkje T W de Jong-van den Berg; Anne-Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Aebele B Mink van der Molen; Régine P M Steegers-Theunissen
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2006-08

7.  Regulation of SUMOylation by reversible oxidation of SUMO conjugating enzymes.

Authors:  Guillaume Bossis; Frauke Melchior
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 8.  The relationship between cleft lip, maxillary hypoplasia, hypoxia and phenytoin.

Authors:  William S Webster; Andrew M Howe; Dominique Abela; Diana J Oakes
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.116

9.  TBX5, a gene mutated in Holt-Oram syndrome, is regulated through a GC box and T-box binding elements (TBEs).

Authors:  Guifeng Sun; Lisa E Lewis; Xu Huang; Quang Nguyen; Christopher Price; Taosheng Huang
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 4.429

10.  The T-box factor TBX-2 and the SUMO conjugating enzyme UBC-9 are required for ABa-derived pharyngeal muscle in C. elegans.

Authors:  Sinchita Roy Chowdhuri; Tanya Crum; Alison Woollard; Sobia Aslam; Peter G Okkema
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 3.582

View more
  33 in total

1.  Small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) modification mediates function of the inhibitory domains of developmental regulators FOXC1 and FOXC2.

Authors:  Theodora E Danciu; Sergey Chupreta; Osvaldo Cruz; Jennifer E Fox; Malcolm Whitman; Jorge A Iñiguez-Lluhí
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Jmjd3 and UTX play a demethylase-independent role in chromatin remodeling to regulate T-box family member-dependent gene expression.

Authors:  Sara A Miller; Sarah E Mohn; Amy S Weinmann
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 3.  Common themes emerge in the transcriptional control of T helper and developmental cell fate decisions regulated by the T-box, GATA and ROR families.

Authors:  Sara A Miller; Amy S Weinmann
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.397

4.  Coordinated but physically separable interaction with H3K27-demethylase and H3K4-methyltransferase activities are required for T-box protein-mediated activation of developmental gene expression.

Authors:  Sara A Miller; Albert C Huang; Michael M Miazgowicz; Margaret M Brassil; Amy S Weinmann
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 5.  Genetics of nonsyndromic orofacial clefts.

Authors:  Fedik Rahimov; Astanand Jugessur; Jeffrey C Murray
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2011-05-05

6.  Novel TBX22 mutations in Chinese nonsyndromic cleft lip/palate families.

Authors:  Jiewen Dai; Chen Xu; Guomin Wang; Yun Liang; Teng Wan; Yong Zhang; Xiaofeng Xu; Lebin Yu; Zonggang Che; Qiqing Han; Dandan Wu; Yusheng Yang
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.166

7.  Distinct genetic alterations in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hassan Ashktorab; Alejandro A Schäffer; Mohammad Daremipouran; Duane T Smoot; Edward Lee; Hassan Brim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  X-linked markers in the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene associated with oral clefts.

Authors:  Poorav J Patel; Terri H Beaty; Ingo Ruczinski; Jeffrey C Murray; Mary L Marazita; Ronald G Munger; Jacqueline B Hetmanski; Tao Wu; Tanda Murray; Margaret Rose; Richard J Redett; Sheng C Jin; Rolv T Lie; Yah-Huei Wu-Chou; Hong Wang; Xiaoqian Ye; Vincent Yeow; Samuel Chong; Sun H Jee; Bing Shi; Alan F Scott
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.612

9.  Testing reported associations of genetic risk factors for oral clefts in a large Irish study population.

Authors:  Tonia C Carter; Anne M Molloy; Faith Pangilinan; James F Troendle; Peadar N Kirke; Mary R Conley; David J A Orr; Michael Earley; Eamon McKiernan; Ena C Lynn; Anne Doyle; John M Scott; Lawrence C Brody; James L Mills
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2010-02

10.  Cleft lip and palate genetics and application in early embryological development.

Authors:  Wenli Yu; Maria Serrano; Symone San Miguel; L Bruno Ruest; Kathy K H Svoboda
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2009-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.