Literature DB >> 17845817

Analysis of subcritical crack growth in dental ceramics using fracture mechanics and fractography.

Burak Taskonak1, Jason A Griggs, John J Mecholsky, Jia-Hau Yan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the flexural strengths and critical flaw sizes of dental ceramic specimens will be affected by the testing environment and stressing rate even though their fracture toughness values will remain the same.
METHODS: Ceramic specimens were prepared from an aluminous porcelain (Vitadur Alpha; VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) and an alumina-zirconia-glass composite (In-Ceram Zirconia; VITA Zahnfabrik). Three hundred uniaxial flexure specimens (150 of each material) were fabricated to dimensions of 25 mmx4 mmx1.2 mm according to the ISO 6872 standard. Each group of 30 specimens was fractured in water using one of four different target stressing rates ranging on a logarithmic scale from 0.1 to 100 MPa/s for Vitadur Alpha and from 0.01 to 10 MPa/s for In-Ceram Zirconia. The fifth group was tested in inert environment (oil) with a target stressing rate of 100 MPa/s for Vitadur Alpha and 1000 MPa/s for In-Ceram Zirconia. The effects of stressing rate and environment on flexural strength, critical flaw size, and fracture toughness were analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks followed by post hoc comparisons using Dunn's test (alpha=0.05). In addition, 20 Vitadur Alpha specimens were fabricated with controlled flaws to simplify fractography. Half of these specimens were fracture tested in water and half in oil at a target stressing rate of 100 MPa/s, and the results were compared using Mann-Whitney rank sum tests (alpha=0.05). A logarithmic regression model was used to determine the fatigue parameters for each material.
RESULTS: For each ceramic composition, specimens tested in oil had significantly higher strength (P<or=0.05) and smaller critical flaw size (significant for Vitadur Alpha, P<or=0.05) than those tested in water but did not have significantly different fracture toughness (P>0.05). Specimens tested at faster stressing rates had significantly higher strength (P<or=0.05) but did not have significantly different fracture toughness (P>0.05). Regarding critical flaw size, stressing rate had a significant effect for In-Ceram Zirconia specimens (P<or=0.05) but not for Vitadur Alpha specimens (P>0.05). Fatigue parameters, n and lnB, were 38.4 and -12.7 for Vitadur Alpha and were 13.1 and 10.4 for In-Ceram Zirconia. SIGNIFICANCE: Moisture assisted subcritical crack growth had a more deleterious effect on In-Ceram Zirconia core ceramic than on Vitadur Alpha porcelain. Fracture surface analysis identified fracture surface features that can potentially mislead investigators into misidentifying the critical flaw.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17845817      PMCID: PMC2358925          DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  26 in total

1.  Lifetime-limiting strength degradation from contact fatigue in dental ceramics.

Authors:  Y G Jung; I M Peterson; D K Kim; B R Lawn
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Influence of core buildup material on the fatigue strength of an all-ceramic crown.

Authors:  S S Azer; J L Drummond; S D Campbell; A El Moneim Zaki
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Mechanism of strength increase for a hydrothermal porcelain.

Authors:  Jason A Griggs; Anil Kishen; Kim Nga Le
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Three-year clinical evaluation of In-Ceram Zirconia posterior FPDs.

Authors:  María Jesús Suárez; José F L Lozano; María Paz Salido; Francisco Martínez
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.681

5.  Effect of firing temperature and water exposure on crack propagation in unglazed porcelain.

Authors:  K J Anusavice; R B Lee
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  Subcritical crack growth behavior of Al2O3-glass dental composites.

Authors:  Qingshan Zhu; Gijsbertus de With; Leonardus J M G Dortmans; Frits Feenstra
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 3.368

7.  Fatigue characteristics of a high-strength porcelain.

Authors:  M L Myers; J W Ergle; C W Fairhurst; R D Ringle
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.681

8.  Residual stresses in bilayer dental ceramics.

Authors:  Burak Taskonak; John J Mecholsky; Kenneth J Anusavice
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Clinical performance of a lithia disilicate-based core ceramic for three-unit posterior FPDs.

Authors:  Josephine F Esquivel-Upshaw; Kenneth J Anusavice; Henry Young; Jack Jones; Charles Gibbs
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.681

10.  Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics.

Authors:  Gilberto Antonio Borges; Ana Maria Sophr; Mario Fernando de Goes; Lourenço Correr Sobrinho; Daniel C N Chan
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.426

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Performance of dental ceramics: challenges for improvements.

Authors:  E D Rekow; N R F A Silva; P G Coelho; Y Zhang; P Guess; V P Thompson
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Fracture resistance of three-unit zirconia fixed partial denture with modified framework.

Authors:  Arthur Partiyan; Essam Osman; Mohammad M Rayyan; Moustafa Aboushelib; Ahmed Ibrahim; Ryo Jimbo
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Effects of stress rate and calculation method on subcritical crack growth parameters deduced from constant stress-rate flexural testing.

Authors:  Jason A Griggs; Samer M Alaqeel; Yunlong Zhang; Amp W Miller; Zhuo Cai
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 5.304

4.  Step-stress analysis for predicting dental ceramic reliability.

Authors:  Márcia Borba; Paulo F Cesar; Jason A Griggs; Alvaro Della Bona
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Effect of the microstructure on the lifetime of dental ceramics.

Authors:  Márcia Borba; Maico D de Araújo; Karen A Fukushima; Humberto N Yoshimura; Paulo F Cesar; Jason A Griggs; Alvaro Della Bona
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 6.  Fatigue of dental ceramics.

Authors:  Yu Zhang; Irena Sailer; Brian R Lawn
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.