Literature DB >> 17845518

Combining ontogenetic and evolutionary scales of morphological disparity: a study of early Jurassic ammonites.

Sylvain Gerber1, Pascal Neige, Gunther J Eble.   

Abstract

Two major research themes in Evolutionary Developmental Biology and in Paleobiology, respectively, have each become central for the analysis and interpretation of morphological changes in evolution: the study of ontogeny/phylogeny connections, mainly within the widespread and controversial framework of heterochrony; and the study of morphological disparity, the morphological signal of biodiversity, describing secular changes in morphospace occupation during the history of any given clade. Although enriching in their respective fields, these two themes have remained rather isolated to date, despite the potential value of integrating them as some recent studies begin to suggest. Here, we explore the recent notion of developmental morphospace-morphospace carrying ontogenetic information-as a potential tool for bridging the gap between disparity dynamics and developmental dynamics. We elaborate this approach with a case study of Early Jurassic ammonite family Hildoceratidae (Mollusca, Cephalopoda). Morphometric analyses of the shell shape of 20 species spanning the morphological spectrum of the family are used to quantify and contrast juvenile and adult disparity levels. Adult disparity is significantly greater than juvenile disparity at the family level; yet, some subclades also display different patterns. In addition, comparisons of ontogenetic trajectories underline the prevalence of heterochrony-based evolutionary modifications within subfamilies (via ontogenetic scaling); they also point to the probable existence of pervasive developmental constraints structuring inhomogeneous morphospace occupation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17845518     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2007.00185.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Dev        ISSN: 1520-541X            Impact factor:   1.930


  12 in total

1.  Diversity trends and their ontogenetic basis: an exploration of allometric disparity in rodents.

Authors:  Laura A B Wilson; Marcelo R Sánchez-Villagra
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The future of the fossil record: Paleontology in the 21st century.

Authors:  David Jablonski; Neil H Shubin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Detecting (non)parallel evolution in multidimensional spaces: angles, correlations and eigenanalysis.

Authors:  Junya Watanabe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 4.  The floral morphospace--a modern comparative approach to study angiosperm evolution.

Authors:  Marion Chartier; Florian Jabbour; Sylvain Gerber; Philipp Mitteroecker; Hervé Sauquet; Maria von Balthazar; Yannick Staedler; Peter R Crane; Jürg Schönenberger
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  Different cranial ontogeny in Europeans and Southern Africans.

Authors:  Marina L Sardi; Fernando V Ramírez Rozzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Disparity changes in 370 Ma Devonian fossils: the signature of ecological dynamics?

Authors:  Catherine Girard; Sabrina Renaud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Strategies in times of crisis-insights into the benthic foraminiferal record of the Palaeocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum.

Authors:  Daniela N Schmidt; Ellen Thomas; Elisabeth Authier; David Saunders; Andy Ridgwell
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-10-13       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Allometric disparity in rodent evolution.

Authors:  Laura A B Wilson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  On growth and form of irregular coiled-shell of a terrestrial snail: Plectostoma concinnum (Fulton, 1901) (Mollusca: Caenogastropoda: Diplommatinidae).

Authors:  Thor-Seng Liew; Annebelle C M Kok; Menno Schilthuizen; Severine Urdy
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Cranial ontogenetic variation in early saurischians and the role of heterochrony in the diversification of predatory dinosaurs.

Authors:  Christian Foth; Brandon P Hedrick; Martin D Ezcurra
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.