BACKGROUND: An Emergency Department (ED) visit represents a time of significant risk for an older adult; however, little is known about adverse outcomes after an ED visit in the VA system. OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe the frequency and type of adverse health outcomes among older veterans discharged from the ED, and 2) To determine risk factors associated with adverse outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study at an academically affiliated VA medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 942 veterans > or = 65 years old discharged from the ED. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary dependent variable was adverse outcome, defined as a repeat VA ED visit, hospitalization, and/or death within 90 days. Overall, 320 (34.0%) patients experienced an adverse outcome: 245 (26%) returned to the VA ED but were not admitted, 125 (13.3%) were hospitalized, and 23 (2.4%) died. In adjusted analyses, higher score on the Charlson Comorbidity Index (hazard ratio [HR] 1.11; 95% CI 1.03, 1.21), ED visit within the previous 6 months (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.30, 2.06), hospitalization within the previous 6 months (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.30, 2.22), and triage to the emergency unit (compared to urgent care clinic) (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.32, 2.36) were independently associated with higher risk of adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: More than 1 in 3 older veterans discharged from the ED experienced a significant adverse outcome within 90 days of ED discharge. Identifying veterans at greatest risk for adverse outcomes after ED discharge can inform the design and targeting of interventions to reduce morbidity and costs in this group.
BACKGROUND: An Emergency Department (ED) visit represents a time of significant risk for an older adult; however, little is known about adverse outcomes after an ED visit in the VA system. OBJECTIVES: 1) To describe the frequency and type of adverse health outcomes among older veterans discharged from the ED, and 2) To determine risk factors associated with adverse outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective, cohort study at an academically affiliated VA medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 942 veterans > or = 65 years old discharged from the ED. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary dependent variable was adverse outcome, defined as a repeat VA ED visit, hospitalization, and/or death within 90 days. Overall, 320 (34.0%) patients experienced an adverse outcome: 245 (26%) returned to the VA ED but were not admitted, 125 (13.3%) were hospitalized, and 23 (2.4%) died. In adjusted analyses, higher score on the Charlson Comorbidity Index (hazard ratio [HR] 1.11; 95% CI 1.03, 1.21), ED visit within the previous 6 months (HR 1.64; 95% CI 1.30, 2.06), hospitalization within the previous 6 months (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.30, 2.22), and triage to the emergency unit (compared to urgent care clinic) (HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.32, 2.36) were independently associated with higher risk of adverse outcomes. CONCLUSION: More than 1 in 3 older veterans discharged from the ED experienced a significant adverse outcome within 90 days of ED discharge. Identifying veterans at greatest risk for adverse outcomes after ED discharge can inform the design and targeting of interventions to reduce morbidity and costs in this group.
Authors: D M Smith; A Giobbie-Hurder; M Weinberger; E Z Oddone; W G Henderson; D A Asch; C M Ashton; J R Feussner; P Ginier; J M Huey; D M Hynes; L Loo; C E Mengel Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Stephen W Meldon; Lorraine C Mion; Robert M Palmer; Barbara L Drew; Jason T Connor; Linda J Lewicki; David M Bass; Charles L Emerman Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Scott T Wilber; Lowell W Gerson; Kevin M Terrell; Christopher R Carpenter; Manish N Shah; Kennon Heard; Ula Hwang Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2006-10-27 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Jin H Han; Suzanne N Bryce; E Wesley Ely; Sunil Kripalani; Alessandro Morandi; Ayumi Shintani; James C Jackson; Alan B Storrow; Robert S Dittus; John Schnelle Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: S Nicole Hastings; Jama L Purser; Kimberly S Johnson; Richard J Sloane; Heather E Whitson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-08-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Kristina M Cordasco; Susan M Frayne; Devan Kansagara; Donna M Zulman; Steven M Asch; Robert E Burke; Edward P Post; Stephan D Fihn; Thomas Klobucar; Laurence J Meyer; Susan R Kirsh; David Atkins Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: S Nicole Hastings; Heather E Whitson; Richard Sloane; Lawrence R Landerman; Carolyn Horney; Kimberly S Johnson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-03-17 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Susan N Hastings; Karen M Stechuchak; Cynthia J Coffman; Elizabeth P Mahanna; Morris Weinberger; Courtney H Van Houtven; Kenneth E Schmader; Cristina C Hendrix; Chad Kessler; Jaime M Hughes; Katherine Ramos; G Darryl Wieland; Madeline Weiner; Katina Robinson; Eugene Oddone Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-09-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Manish N Shah; Matthew M Hollander; Courtney Mc Jones; Thomas V Caprio; Yeates Conwell; Jeremy T Cushman; Eva H DuGoff; Amy J H Kind; Michael Lohmeier; Ranran Mi; Eric A Coleman Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-08-10 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: S Gentile; O Lacroix; A C Durand; E Cretel; M Alazia; R Sambuc; S Bonin-Guillaume Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Richard T Griffey; Nicole Shin; Solita Jones; Nnenna Aginam; Maureen Gross; Yonitte Kinsella; Jennifer A Williams; Christopher R Carpenter; Melody Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst Journal: J Commun Healthc Date: 2015-03
Authors: S Nicole Hastings; Heather E Whitson; Jama L Purser; Richard J Sloane; Kimberly S Johnson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-08-20 Impact factor: 5.562