BACKGROUND: Diagnostic assessment of myocardial perfusion impacts the management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Although various image displays are available for single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) interpretation, the effects of display differences on SPECT interpretation remain undetermined. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 183 patients undergoing SPECT, including 131 consecutive patients referred for angiography and 52 at low CAD risk. Studies were visually interpreted by use of color and gray images, with readers blinded to the results of the other display. In accordance with established criteria, a summed stress score (SSS) of 4 or greater was considered abnormal. The prevalence of abnormal SPECT findings was higher with gray images than with color images (54% vs 48%, P < .001) based on a uniform criterion (SSS > or =4). However, color images yielded equivalent sensitivity (79% vs 82%, P = .7) and improved specificity for global (50% vs 33%, P = .02) and vessel-specific CAD involving the right coronary artery (P < .01) and left anterior descending artery (P < .05). When the criterion for gray images was adjusted upward (SSS > or =5) to reflect increased mean defect severity (SSS of 5.1 vs 4.4, P = .01), gray and color images provided equivalent sensitivity and specificity for global and vessel-specific CAD. CONCLUSIONS: SPECT interpretation can vary according to image display as a result of differences in perfusion defect severity. Adjustment of abnormality criteria for gray images to reflect minor increases in defect severity provides equivalent diagnostic performance of gray and color displays for CAD assessment.
BACKGROUND: Diagnostic assessment of myocardial perfusion impacts the management of patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Although various image displays are available for single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) interpretation, the effects of display differences on SPECT interpretation remain undetermined. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 183 patients undergoing SPECT, including 131 consecutive patients referred for angiography and 52 at low CAD risk. Studies were visually interpreted by use of color and gray images, with readers blinded to the results of the other display. In accordance with established criteria, a summed stress score (SSS) of 4 or greater was considered abnormal. The prevalence of abnormal SPECT findings was higher with gray images than with color images (54% vs 48%, P < .001) based on a uniform criterion (SSS > or =4). However, color images yielded equivalent sensitivity (79% vs 82%, P = .7) and improved specificity for global (50% vs 33%, P = .02) and vessel-specific CAD involving the right coronary artery (P < .01) and left anterior descending artery (P < .05). When the criterion for gray images was adjusted upward (SSS > or =5) to reflect increased mean defect severity (SSS of 5.1 vs 4.4, P = .01), gray and color images provided equivalent sensitivity and specificity for global and vessel-specific CAD. CONCLUSIONS: SPECT interpretation can vary according to image display as a result of differences in perfusion defect severity. Adjustment of abnormality criteria for gray images to reflect minor increases in defect severity provides equivalent diagnostic performance of gray and color displays for CAD assessment.
Authors: L J Shaw; R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; T H Marwick; M S Lauer; G V Heller; A E Iskandrian; K L Kesler; M I Travin; H C Lewin; R C Hendel; S Borges-Neto; D D Miller Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-29 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Christopher L Hansen; Richard A Goldstein; Daniel S Berman; Keith B Churchwell; C David Cooke; James R Corbett; S James Cullom; Seth T Dahlberg; James R Galt; Ravi K Garg; Gary V Heller; Mark C Hyun; Lynne L Johnson; April Mann; Benjamin D McCallister; Raymond Taillefer; R Parker Ward; John J Mahmarian Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: X Kang; D S Berman; H C Lewin; R Miranda; R Agafitei; I Cohen; J D Friedman; G Germano Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2000 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: J Candell-Riera; C Santana-Boado; B Bermejo; L Armadans; J Castell; I Casáns; J Jurado; J Magriñá; J N de la Rosa Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2001 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; H Kiat; I Cohen; H Lewin; A Amanullah; X Kang; J Friedman; G A Diamond Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1997-08-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: D S Berman; H Kiat; J D Friedman; F P Wang; K van Train; L Matzer; J Maddahi; G Germano Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1993-11-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Raymond J Gibbons; Jonathan Abrams; Kanu Chatterjee; Jennifer Daley; Prakash C Deedwania; John S Douglas; T Bruce Ferguson; Stephan D Fihn; Theodore D Fraker; Julius M Gardin; Robert A O'Rourke; Richard C Pasternak; Sankey V Williams; Raymond J Gibbons; Joseph S Alpert; Elliott M Antman; Loren F Hiratzka; Valentin Fuster; David P Faxon; Gabriel Gregoratos; Alice K Jacobs; Sidney C Smith Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-01-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Parag Goyal; Jiwon Kim; Attila Feher; Claudia L Ma; Sergey Gurevich; David R Veal; Massimiliano Szulc; Franklin J Wong; Mark B Ratcliffe; Robert A Levine; Richard B Devereux; Jonathan W Weinsaft Journal: Coron Artery Dis Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 1.439
Authors: Jiwon Kim; Antonino Di Franco; Tania Seoane; Aparna Srinivasan; Polydoros N Kampaktsis; Alexi Geevarghese; Samantha R Goldburg; Saadat A Khan; Massimiliano Szulc; Mark B Ratcliffe; Robert A Levine; Ashley E Morgan; Pooja Maddula; Meenakshi Rozenstrauch; Tara Shah; Richard B Devereux; Jonathan W Weinsaft Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Samuel C Volo; Jiwon Kim; Sergey Gurevich; Maya Petashnick; Polydoros Kampaktsis; Attila Feher; Massimiliano Szulc; Franklin J Wong; Richard B Devereux; Peter M Okin; Leonard N Girardi; James K Min; Robert A Levine; Jonathan W Weinsaft Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Polydoros N Kampaktsis; Benjamin J Albert; Jiwon Kim; Lola X Xie; Lillian R Brouwer; Nathan H Tehrani; Michael Villanueva; Daniel Y Choi; Massimiliano Szulc; Mark B Ratcliffe; Robert A Levine; Richard B Devereux; Jonathan W Weinsaft Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 5.501