Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Gated myocardial perfusion imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function and volume: from SPECT to PET.

× No keyword cloud information.

20 in total

1. Prognostic indicators from radionuclide angiography in medically treated patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors: D B Pryor; F E Harrell; K L Lee; R A Rosati; R E Coleman; F R Cobb; R M Califf; R H Jones
Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1984-01-01 Impact factor: 2.778

2. Quantitative analysis of regional motion and thickening by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: normal heterogeneity and criteria for abnormality.

Authors: T Sharir; D S Berman; P B Waechter; J Areeda; P B Kavanagh; J Gerlach; X Kang; G Germano
Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 10.057

3. Gated cardiac 13N-NH3 PET for assessment of left ventricular volumes, mass, and ejection fraction: comparison with electrocardiography-gated 18F-FDG PET.

Authors: Aliasghar Khorsand; Senta Graf; Harald Eidherr; Wolfgang Wadsak; Kurt Kletter; Heinz Sochor; Ernst Schuster; Gerold Porenta
Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 10.057

4. Prediction of myocardial infarction versus cardiac death by gated myocardial perfusion SPECT: risk stratification by the amount of stress-induced ischemia and the poststress ejection fraction.

Authors: T Sharir; G Germano; X Kang; H C Lewin; R Miranda; I Cohen; R D Agafitei; J D Friedman; D S Berman
Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 10.057

5. Validation of an evaluation routine for left ventricular volumes, ejection fraction and wall motion from gated cardiac FDG PET: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors: Wolfgang M Schaefer; Claudia S A Lipke; Bernd Nowak; Hans Juergen Kaiser; Arno Buecker; Gabriele A Krombach; Udalrich Buell; Harald P Kühl
Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2003-02-15 Impact factor: 9.236

6. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction.

Authors: H D White; R M Norris; M A Brown; P W Brandt; R M Whitlock; C J Wild
Journal: Circulation Date: 1987-07 Impact factor: 29.690

7. Validation of QGS and 4D-MSPECT for quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction from gated 18F-FDG PET: comparison with cardiac MRI.

Authors: Wolfgang M Schaefer; Claudia S A Lipke; Bernd Nowak; Hans-Juergen Kaiser; Patrick Reinartz; Arno Buecker; Gabriele A Krombach; Udalrich Buell; Harald P Kühl
Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 10.057

8. End-systolic volume and long-term survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with impaired left ventricular function.

Authors: A W Hamer; M Takayama; K A Abraham; A H Roche; A R Kerr; B F Williams; M C Ramage; H D White
Journal: Circulation Date: 1994-12 Impact factor: 29.690

9. Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT.

Authors: Timothy M Bateman; Gary V Heller; A Iain McGhie; John D Friedman; James A Case; Jan R Bryngelson; Ginger K Hertenstein; Kelly L Moutray; Kimberly Reid; S James Cullom
Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.952

10. Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors: Uchechukwu K Sampson; Sharmila Dorbala; Atul Limaye; Raymond Kwong; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-02-26 Impact factor: 24.094

1 in total

Review 1. Facts and figures on CAD assessment with SPECT and PET-CT.

Authors: Giovanni Lucignani
Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-02 Impact factor: 9.236

1 in total