| Literature DB >> 17825025 |
Abstract
Statistical validation of a surrogate marker has been studied for more than a decade. Recently, Alonso et al. (2004, Biometrics 60, 724-728) proposed a quantity called the likelihood reduction factor (LRF) to evaluate the validity of a surrogate marker. However, as pointed out in the present article, the LRF may not correctly validate a surrogate marker. Therefore, a new quantity, the proportion of information gain (PIG) using the Kullback-Leibler information, is proposed. Simulations show that under some model assumptions, the PIG precisely reflects the role of a surrogate marker.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17825025 DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00852_1.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biometrics ISSN: 0006-341X Impact factor: 2.571