Literature DB >> 17822460

Cryoablation of small renal masses: assessment of the outcome at one institution.

Gaurav Bandi1, Charles C Wen, Sean P Hedican, Timothy D Moon, Fred T Lee, Stephen Y Nakada.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report our 5-year experience with laparoscopic and percutaneous cryoablation (LCA and PCA) for managing small renal masses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analysed patients undergoing LCA and PCA between October 2000 and March 2006 at our institution. After approval from the Institutional Review Board, charts were reviewed retrospectively for variables during and after CA, and for clinical outcomes, the latter including the efficacy of the procedure in achieving overall, cancer-specific and recurrence-free survival.
RESULTS: In all, 78 patients had CA of 88 small renal masses, by LCA in 58 and PCA in 20. The median American Society of Anesthesiology score was 3 and the mean body mass index was 30 kg/m(2). All procedures were done under general anaesthesia, with a mean anaesthesia time of 220 min. The mean tumour size was 2.6 cm and the mean hospital stay was 2.1 days. At a mean follow-up of 19 months, the overall, cancer-specific and recurrence-free survival rates were 88.5%, 100% and 98.7%, respectively. Four patients required a repeat treatment due to persistent disease and one had progression to locally advanced disease. Five patients had complications during CA and seven had complications afterward.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that CA is a safe, minimally invasive treatment option for patients with small renal masses, at the intermediate-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17822460     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07158.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  10 in total

1.  Efficacy of laparoscopic renal cryoablation as an alternative treatment for small renal mass in patients with poor operability: experience from the Korean single center.

Authors:  Young Hwii Ko; Hoon Choi; Sung Gu Kang; Hong Seok Park; Jeong Gu Lee; Je Jong Kim; Seok Ho Kang; Jun Cheon
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 2.  Focal ablation therapy for renal cancer in the era of active surveillance and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Serge Ginzburg; Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Surgical cryoablation as an option for small renal masses in patients who are not ideal partial nephrectomy candidates: intermediate-term outcomes.

Authors:  Venu Chalasani; Carlos H Martinez; Darwin Lim; Mazen Abdelhady; Joseph L Chin
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation of renal cell carcinoma in older patients with medical comorbidities: Outcome study in 70 patients.

Authors:  Erich K Lang; Kan Karl Zhang; Quan Nguyen; Leann Myers; Mahamed Allaf; Ivan Colon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation of the small renal mass : a meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Kunkle; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Focal therapy for kidney cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alexander Kutikov; David A Kunkle; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 7.  Thermal Ablation of Renal Tumors: Indications, Techniques and Results.

Authors:  Marc Regier; Felix Chun
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 8.  Role of tumor location in selecting patients for percutaneous versus surgical cryoablation of renal masses.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Daniel J Canter; Marc C Smaldone; Tianyu Li; Jay Simhan; Boris Rozenfeld; Ervin Teper; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Rosalia Viterbo; Robert G Uzzo; Alexander Kutikov
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.344

9.  Review of the efficacy and safety of cryoablation for the treatment of small renal masses.

Authors:  Anil Kapoor; Naji J Touma; Regina El Dib
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Cryoablation for small renal masses.

Authors:  J L Dominguez-Escrig; K Sahadevan; P Johnson
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2008
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.