INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to establish the efficacy of cryoablation for incidentally discovered small renal cell carcinomas in older patients with medical comorbidities. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective chart analysis of outcomes of 70 patients treated by cryoablation. The inclusion criteria were age >56 years, medical comorbidities (Charlson class I-III), and suitability for cryoablation established by urologists and interventional radiologists. In total, 43 patients were male, 27 female, and the age range was 56 to 89. The lesions measured 1.5 to 4 cm; 29 were high-grade Fuhrman and 41 were low grade. All lesions were treated by 2 10-minute freezing cycles separated by an 8-minute thawing period. One to seven cryoprobes were inserted according to a preoperative, 3D computed tomography (CT)-based plan. RESULTS: Results were assessed on follow-up CTs (at 8-9 months). Of the 70 patients, 68 were treated by cryoablations and surgical salvage procedures; these patients were free of disease for 23 to 72 months (mean 39). One patient experienced recurrence and the other was lost to follow-up. One or two cryoablations rendered 66 patients tumour-free and additional surgery rendered another 2 patients tumour-free. The location and configuration of the lesion affected outcomes. Of the 27 posterior lesions, there was 1 failure; of the postero-lateral lesions, there were 4 failures; of the anterior lesions, there were 5 lesions; finally of the 32 central or deep seated lesions, there were 9 failures. Implants with one and two cryoprobes had a high recurrence rate. Three major complications were managed by minor interventions. The mean hospitalization was 1.3 days and the procedure times were variable. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous cryoablation is recommended as a minimally invasive nephron-sparing treatment for amenable lesions in older patients with medical comorbidities.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to establish the efficacy of cryoablation for incidentally discovered small renal cell carcinomas in older patients with medical comorbidities. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective chart analysis of outcomes of 70 patients treated by cryoablation. The inclusion criteria were age >56 years, medical comorbidities (Charlson class I-III), and suitability for cryoablation established by urologists and interventional radiologists. In total, 43 patients were male, 27 female, and the age range was 56 to 89. The lesions measured 1.5 to 4 cm; 29 were high-grade Fuhrman and 41 were low grade. All lesions were treated by 2 10-minute freezing cycles separated by an 8-minute thawing period. One to seven cryoprobes were inserted according to a preoperative, 3D computed tomography (CT)-based plan. RESULTS: Results were assessed on follow-up CTs (at 8-9 months). Of the 70 patients, 68 were treated by cryoablations and surgical salvage procedures; these patients were free of disease for 23 to 72 months (mean 39). One patient experienced recurrence and the other was lost to follow-up. One or two cryoablations rendered 66 patientstumour-free and additional surgery rendered another 2 patientstumour-free. The location and configuration of the lesion affected outcomes. Of the 27 posterior lesions, there was 1 failure; of the postero-lateral lesions, there were 4 failures; of the anterior lesions, there were 5 lesions; finally of the 32 central or deep seated lesions, there were 9 failures. Implants with one and two cryoprobes had a high recurrence rate. Three major complications were managed by minor interventions. The mean hospitalization was 1.3 days and the procedure times were variable. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous cryoablation is recommended as a minimally invasive nephron-sparing treatment for amenable lesions in older patients with medical comorbidities.
Authors: Michael D Rosenberg; Charles Y Kim; Matvey Tsivian; Matthew N Suberlak; David R Sopko; Thomas J Polascik; Rendon C Nelson Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Gino J Vricella; John R Haaga; Brittany L Adler; Edward E Cherullo; Susan Flick; Lee E Ponsky Journal: Urology Date: 2010-12-24 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Richard E Link; Sam B Bhayani; Mohammed E Allaf; Ioannis Varkarakis; Takeshi Inagaki; Craig Rogers; Li-Ming Su; Thomas W Jarrett; Louis R Kavoussi Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Grant D Schmit; Thomas D Atwell; Matthew R Callstrom; Michael A Farrell; Bradley C Leibovich; David E Patterson; George K Chow; Michael L Blute; J William Charboneau Journal: J Endourol Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Kurt H Strom; Ithaar Derweesh; Sean P Stroup; John B Malcolm; James L'Esperance; Robert W Wake; Robert Gold; Michael Fabrizio; Kerrin Palazzi-Churas; Xiao Gu; Carson Wong Journal: J Endourol Date: 2011-02-28 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Thomas D Atwell; Matthew R Callstrom; Michael A Farrell; Grant D Schmit; David A Woodrum; Bradley C Leibovich; George K Chow; David E Patterson; Michael L Blute; J William Charboneau Journal: J Urol Date: 2010-08-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: David C Miller; John M Hollingsworth; Khaled S Hafez; Stephanie Daignault; Brent K Hollenbeck Journal: J Urol Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Alp Tuna Beksac; Gerant Rivera-Sanfeliz; Catherine A Dufour; Unwanaobong Nseyo; Zachary Hamilton; Sean W Berquist; Abd-elRahman Hassan; Omer A Raheem; Song Wang; Robert W Wake; Robert E Gold; Ithaar H Derweesh Journal: World J Urol Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Matthew Seager; Shankar Kumar; Emma Lim; Graham Munneke; Steve Bandula; Miles Walkden Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 3.039