OBJECTIVES: To assess the wound complications and reductions achieved in a cohort of patients with pilon fractures who were treated using a novel lateral approach. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Two level 1 trauma centers affiliated with academic institutions. PATIENTS/ METHODS: All 44 fractures (in 43 patients) treated by the senior authors with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using the lateral approach as the primary approach were included. INTERVENTION: Data regarding medical comorbidities, mechanism of injury, soft-tissue injury sustained during the injury, treatment, wound healing, and secondary surgeries were recorded. Fractures were classified using the AO/OTA system with most being type C3. Eighteen fractures were open injuries (10 type 3). Fracture reductions were scored using the criteria of Teeny and Wiss. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Quality of articular reduction and soft-tissue healing. RESULTS: An anatomic or good fracture reduction was achieved in 41 fractures (93%), and a fair reduction was obtained in 3 fractures. Two patients were successfully treated for deep infection (4.5%), and 2 patients developed a wound dehiscence (4.5%). There were no amputations. Twelve patients underwent secondary surgeries (27%). Five of these were for symptomatic screw removal (related to the fibular hardware in all cases), and the sixth was for planned removal of a syndesmotic-type screw (13.6%). Four were for nonunion, representing 9% of all cases. The remaining secondary surgeries (2 cases) were performed for infection. Overall, 13.6% of patients underwent a secondary surgical procedure to address nonunion or infection. CONCLUSIONS: When applied in a staged fashion, the lateral surgical approach for pilon fractures provides excellent protection of the soft-tissue envelopes by creating thick flaps while allowing excellent visualization for reconstruction of the anterior and lateral distal tibia.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the wound complications and reductions achieved in a cohort of patients with pilon fractures who were treated using a novel lateral approach. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Two level 1 trauma centers affiliated with academic institutions. PATIENTS/ METHODS: All 44 fractures (in 43 patients) treated by the senior authors with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using the lateral approach as the primary approach were included. INTERVENTION: Data regarding medical comorbidities, mechanism of injury, soft-tissue injury sustained during the injury, treatment, wound healing, and secondary surgeries were recorded. Fractures were classified using the AO/OTA system with most being type C3. Eighteen fractures were open injuries (10 type 3). Fracture reductions were scored using the criteria of Teeny and Wiss. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Quality of articular reduction and soft-tissue healing. RESULTS: An anatomic or good fracture reduction was achieved in 41 fractures (93%), and a fair reduction was obtained in 3 fractures. Two patients were successfully treated for deep infection (4.5%), and 2 patients developed a wound dehiscence (4.5%). There were no amputations. Twelve patients underwent secondary surgeries (27%). Five of these were for symptomatic screw removal (related to the fibular hardware in all cases), and the sixth was for planned removal of a syndesmotic-type screw (13.6%). Four were for nonunion, representing 9% of all cases. The remaining secondary surgeries (2 cases) were performed for infection. Overall, 13.6% of patients underwent a secondary surgical procedure to address nonunion or infection. CONCLUSIONS: When applied in a staged fashion, the lateral surgical approach for pilon fractures provides excellent protection of the soft-tissue envelopes by creating thick flaps while allowing excellent visualization for reconstruction of the anterior and lateral distal tibia.
Authors: M S Beerekamp; R Haverlag; D T Ubbink; J S Luitse; K J Ponsen; J C Goslings Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2010-10-22 Impact factor: 3.067