Literature DB >> 17803985

Seeing is believing: the effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning.

David P McCabe1, Alan D Castel.   

Abstract

Brain images are believed to have a particularly persuasive influence on the public perception of research on cognition. Three experiments are reported showing that presenting brain images with articles summarizing cognitive neuroscience research resulted in higher ratings of scientific reasoning for arguments made in those articles, as compared to articles accompanied by bar graphs, a topographical map of brain activation, or no image. These data lend support to the notion that part of the fascination, and the credibility, of brain imaging research lies in the persuasive power of the actual brain images themselves. We argue that brain images are influential because they provide a physical basis for abstract cognitive processes, appealing to people's affinity for reductionistic explanations of cognitive phenomena.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17803985     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  77 in total

1.  On network derivation, classification, and visualization: a response to Habeck and Moeller.

Authors:  Erik B Erhardt; Elena A Allen; Eswar Damaraju; Vince D Calhoun
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Mistreating Psychology in the Decades of the Brain.

Authors:  Gregory A Miller
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-11

3.  Visual evidence.

Authors:  Neal Feigenson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

4.  The Cognitive Neuroscience of Sign Language: Engaging Undergraduate Students' Critical Thinking Skills Using the Primary Literature.

Authors:  Courtney Stevens
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2015-10-15

5.  The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations.

Authors:  Deena Skolnick Weisberg; Frank C Keil; Joshua Goodstein; Elizabeth Rawson; Jeremy R Gray
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Guidelines for the ethical use of neuroimages in medical testimony: report of a multidisciplinary consensus conference.

Authors:  C C Meltzer; G Sze; K S Rommelfanger; K Kinlaw; J D Banja; P R Wolpe
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Different clues from different views: the role of image format in public perceptions of neuroimaging results.

Authors:  Madeleine Keehner; Lisa Mayberry; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

8.  [Seeing sounds? The visualization of acoustic phenomena in heart diagnostics].

Authors:  Michael Martin; Heiner Fangerau
Journal:  NTM       Date:  2011

9.  Naive realism in public perceptions of neuroimages.

Authors:  Madeleine Keehner; Martin H Fischer
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 10.  Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research.

Authors:  Judy Illes; Mary Anne Moser; Jennifer B McCormick; Eric Racine; Sandra Blakeslee; Arthur Caplan; Erika Check Hayden; Jay Ingram; Tiffany Lohwater; Peter McKnight; Christie Nicholson; Anthony Phillips; Kevin D Sauvé; Elaine Snell; Samuel Weiss
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 34.870

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.