Literature DB >> 17803336

Preferences of community pharmacists for extended roles in primary care: a survey and discrete choice experiment.

Anthony Scott1, Christine Bond, Jackie Inch, Aileen Grant.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Major changes in the roles and responsibilities of pharmacists across the world are occurring. A new Scottish Community Pharmacy contract was introduced in April 2006, following the introduction of a similar contract in England in 2005. This contract encourages greater involvement in medicines management and other clinical cognitive roles, whilst retaining a supply function.
OBJECTIVE: To use a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to examine the strength of preference of community pharmacists for existing and potential new roles, prior to the introduction of the new contract. STUDY
DESIGN: The DCE was a component of a larger questionnaire, which assessed demography, workload, attitudes to, and satisfaction with, proposed new roles, and current levels of activity. Attributes and levels for the DCE were based on the recent policy document for Scotland, The Right Medicine, and informed consensus, respectively. Scenarios were organised into pairs, and pharmacists were asked "Which job would you prefer?" The questionnaire was mailed to all pharmacists working in the community setting in Scotland (n = 1621), as identified from a telephone survey. The questionnaire was totally anonymous, and two reminders were sent.
RESULTS: There was an overall response rate of 56.4% (914/1621). Community pharmacists preferred to work in an extended pharmacy team, to have strong integration with secondary care, and to provide a minor illness advice service. In 2003, they would forgo an annual income of 3443 pounds, 2183 pounds and 2798 pounds, respectively to achieve this. However, overall, the pharmacists preferred more income to less. Repeat dispensing, chronic disease management, offering health promotion services, and the number of prescriptions dispensed per month were not significant predictors of job choice.
CONCLUSION: Community pharmacists placed the highest value on organisational aspects of their work, and having a first contact primary care role. Although total income was important, there were indications that they would be prepared to forgo income to attain their preferred job.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17803336     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200725090-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  10 in total

1.  Handling uncertainty when performing economic evaluation of healthcare interventions.

Authors:  A H Briggs; A M Gray
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care.

Authors:  M Ryan; S Farrar
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-03

3.  The use of conjoint analysis to elicit willingness-to-pay values. Proceed with caution?

Authors:  J Ratcliffe
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Eliciting GPs' preferences for pecuniary and non-pecuniary job characteristics.

Authors:  A Scott
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Design techniques for stated preference methods in health economics.

Authors:  Fredrik Carlsson; Peter Martinsson
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Conjoint analysis. The cost variable: an Achilles' heel?

Authors:  Ulla Slothuus Skjoldborg; Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 7.  Threats to the estimation of benefit: are preference elicitation methods accurate?

Authors:  Andrew J Lloyd
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory.

Authors:  Emily Lancsar; Elizabeth Savage
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.046

9.  Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (1).

Authors:  Mandy Ryan
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 10.  Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (2).

Authors:  J M C Santos Silva
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.046

  10 in total
  19 in total

Review 1.  Discrete choice experiments of pharmacy services: a systematic review.

Authors:  Caroline Vass; Ewan Gray; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-06

2.  Perspectives of community pharmacists in Pakistan about practice change and implementation of extended pharmacy services: a mixed method study.

Authors:  Furqan Hashmi; Mohamed Azmi Hassali; Fahad Saleem; Hamid Saeed; Muhammad Islam; Usman Rashid Malik; Naveel Atif; Zaheer-Ud-Din Babar
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2021-01-07

3.  Identifying Community Pharmacist Preferences For Prescribing Services in Primary Care in New Zealand: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Rakhee Raghunandan; Kirsten Howard; Carlo A Marra; June Tordoff; Alesha Smith
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.561

4.  Do Professional Practices among Malaysian Private Healthcare Providers Differ? A Comparative Study using Simulated Patients.

Authors:  Alamin Hassan M A Alabid; Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim; Mohamed Azmi Hassali
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-12-15

5.  Applying discrete choice modelling in a priority setting: an investigation of public preferences for primary care models.

Authors:  Chiara Seghieri; Alessandro Mengoni; Sabina Nuti
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-11-15

Review 6.  Public health in community pharmacy: a systematic review of pharmacist and consumer views.

Authors:  Claire E Eades; Jill S Ferguson; Ronan E O'Carroll
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Pharmacists' preferences for the provision of services to improve medication adherence among patients with diabetes in Indonesia: Results of a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Bobby Presley; Wim Groot; Milena Pavlova
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2021-05-19

8.  A review of the application and contribution of discrete choice experiments to inform human resources policy interventions.

Authors:  Mylene Lagarde; Duane Blaauw
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2009-07-24

9.  Fertility patients and their prescriptions: a two-year audit of patient-pharmacist interactions in a reproductive endocrinology practice.

Authors:  Eric Scott Sills; Serhiy A Shurpyak; Deirdre J Gorman; Lyuda V Shkrobot; Grainne U Murray; Beppi Mg O'Connor; Una E Rapple; Alicia O Fogarty; Pavlina Sarkova; Kathy M Brickell; David J Walsh
Journal:  Int Arch Med       Date:  2009-08-03

10.  Teamwork in primary care: perspectives of general practitioners and community nurses in Lithuania.

Authors:  Lina Jaruseviciene; Ida Liseckiene; Leonas Valius; Ausrine Kontrimiene; Gediminas Jarusevicius; Luís Velez Lapão
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.