Matthew L Blommel1, Marie A Abate. 1. West Virginia Center for Drug and Health Information, School of Pharmacy, West Virginia University, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop and describe the use of a rubric for reinforcing critical literature evaluation skills and assessing journal article critiques presented by pharmacy students during journal club exercises. DESIGN: A rubric was developed, tested, and revised as needed to guide students in presenting a published study critique during the second through fourth years of a first-professional doctor of pharmacy degree curriculum and to help faculty members assess student performance and provide formative feedback. Through each rubric iteration, the ease of use and clarity for both evaluators and students were determined with modifications made as indicated. Student feedback was obtained after using the rubric for journal article exercises, and interrater reliability of the rubric was determined. ASSESSMENT: Student feedback regarding rubric use for preparing a clinical study critique was positive across years. Intraclass correlation coefficients were high for each rubric section. The rubric was modified a total of 5 times based upon student feedback and faculty discussions. CONCLUSION: A properly designed and tested rubric can be a useful tool for evaluating student performance during a journal article presentation; however, a rubric can take considerable time to develop. A rubric can also be a valuable student learning aid for applying literature evaluation concepts to the critique of a published study.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and describe the use of a rubric for reinforcing critical literature evaluation skills and assessing journal article critiques presented by pharmacy students during journal club exercises. DESIGN: A rubric was developed, tested, and revised as needed to guide students in presenting a published study critique during the second through fourth years of a first-professional doctor of pharmacy degree curriculum and to help faculty members assess student performance and provide formative feedback. Through each rubric iteration, the ease of use and clarity for both evaluators and students were determined with modifications made as indicated. Student feedback was obtained after using the rubric for journal article exercises, and interrater reliability of the rubric was determined. ASSESSMENT: Student feedback regarding rubric use for preparing a clinical study critique was positive across years. Intraclass correlation coefficients were high for each rubric section. The rubric was modified a total of 5 times based upon student feedback and faculty discussions. CONCLUSION: A properly designed and tested rubric can be a useful tool for evaluating student performance during a journal article presentation; however, a rubric can take considerable time to develop. A rubric can also be a valuable student learning aid for applying literature evaluation concepts to the critique of a published study.
Keywords:
advanced pharmacy practice experience; assessment; drug information; evidence-based medicine; journal club; literature evaluation; rubric
Authors: D G Altman; K F Schulz; D Moher; M Egger; F Davidoff; D Elbourne; P C Gøtzsche; T Lang Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2001-04-17 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: G Bordage; A S Caelleigh; A Steinecke; C J Bland; S J Crandall; W C McGaghie; L N Pangaro; G Penn; G Regehr; J S Shea Journal: Acad Med Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: P Brandon Bookstaver; Celeste N Rudisill; A Rebecca Bickley; Catherine McAbee; April D Miller; Christina C Piro; Richard Schulz Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2011-02-10 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Vincent C Dennis; Dianne W May; Tina J Kanmaz; Shannon L Reidt; Michelle L Serres; Heather D Edwards Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2016-09-25 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Kristin R Villa; Tracy L Sprunger; Alison M Walton; Tracy J Costello; Alex N Isaacs Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2020-07 Impact factor: 2.047