Literature DB >> 17785407

Increased learning observed in redesigned introductory biology course that employed web-enhanced, interactive pedagogy.

Carl N McDaniel1, Bradford C Lister, Michael H Hanna, Harry Roy.   

Abstract

Our Introduction to Biology course (BIOL 1010) changed in 2004 from a standard instructor-centered, lecture-homework-exam format to a student-centered format that used Web-enhanced, interactive pedagogy. To measure and compare conceptual learning gains in the traditional course in fall 2003 with a section of the interactive course in fall 2004, we created concept inventories for both evolution and ecology. Both classes were taught by the same instructor who had taught BIOL 1010 since 1976, and each had a similar student composition with comparable biological knowledge. A significant increase in learning gain was observed with the Web-enhanced, interactive pedagogy in evolution (traditional, 0.10; interactive, 0.19; p = 0.024) and ecology (traditional, -0.05; interactive, 0.14; p = 0.000009) when assessment was made unannounced and for no credit in the last week of classes. These results strengthen the case for augmenting or replacing instructor-centered teaching with Web-enhanced, interactive, student-centered teaching. When assessment was made using the final exam in the interactive course, for credit and after studying, significantly greater learning gains were made in evolution (95%, 0.37, p = 0.0001) and ecology (143%, 0.34, p = 0.000003) when compared with learning gains measured without credit or study in the last week of classes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17785407      PMCID: PMC1964523          DOI: 10.1187/cbe.07-01-0003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ        ISSN: 1931-7913            Impact factor:   3.325


  3 in total

1.  Bioliteracy and teaching efficacy: what biologists can learn from physicists.

Authors:  Michael W Klymkowsky; Kathy Garvin-Doxas; Michael Zeilik
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2003

2.  Education. Scientific teaching.

Authors:  Jo Handelsman; Diane Ebert-May; Robert Beichner; Peter Bruns; Amy Chang; Robert DeHaan; Jim Gentile; Sarah Lauffer; James Stewart; Shirley M Tilghman; William B Wood
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Teaching more by lecturing less.

Authors:  Jennifer K Knight; William B Wood
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005
  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Development, implementation, and assessment of a lecture course on cancer for undergraduates.

Authors:  Michèle Shuster; Karen Peterson
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Redesigning introductory biology: a proposal.

Authors:  Eileen Gregory; Craig Lending; Amanda N Orenstein; Jane P Ellis
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2011-05-19

3.  Is it the intervention or the students? using linear regression to control for student characteristics in undergraduate STEM education research.

Authors:  Roddy Theobald; Scott Freeman
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.325

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.