Literature DB >> 1778207

A new method for quantification of image distortion due to pile-up in scintillation cameras.

C Ceberg1, I Larsson, S E Strand.   

Abstract

Characterization of the count-rate performance of scintillation cameras should include not only the specification of count losses. At high count rates, there is also an image distortion due to the mispositioning of pile-up events. In this paper a simple and clinically relevant procedure to quantify this distortion is presented. The images of a square uniform technetium-99m phantom at high and low count rates are used. The fraction of the total counts being correctly positioned is determined as the peripheral count density divided by the total average count density. This ratio, corrected for the camera non-uniformity at low count rates, is called the 'positioning ability'. According to the National Electrical Manufacturers' Association (NEMA), the 'system count rate performance with scatter' should be reported as the measured count rate giving 20% count losses. In this paper it is suggested that this measure be complemented by a measure of the fraction correct positioned events at this count rate. This fraction, the 'high count rate positioning ability', can be easily and accurately measured using our method. The method has been tested on two different scintillation cameras. For one of them the high count rate positioning ability was determined as 91% at a measured count rate of 30,000 s-1 with 20% count losses. For the other camera, the corresponding figures were 88% at 59,000 s-1 and close to 100% at 38,000 s-1, before and after the installation of a new pile-up rejection circuit, respectively.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1778207     DOI: 10.1007/bf00180416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of a clinical scintillation camera with pulse tail extrapolation electronics.

Authors:  T K Lewellen; A N Bice; K R Pollard; J B Zhu; M E Plunkett
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Clinical significance of scintillation camera electronics capable of high processing rates.

Authors:  P Murphy; R Arseneau; E Maxon; W Thompson
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  A comparison of count rate parameters in gamma cameras.

Authors:  T K Lewellen; R Murano
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Deadtime measurements in scintillation cameras under scatter conditions simulating quantitative nuclear cardiography.

Authors:  R Adams; G J Hine; C D Zimmerman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Comparing the performance of two gamma cameras under high counting rates: principles and practice.

Authors:  C Guldberg; N Rossing
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Image artifacts at high photon fluence rates in single-crystal NaI(T1) scintillation cameras.

Authors:  S E Strand; I Larsson
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Theoretical studies of image artifacts and counting losses for different photon fluence rates and pulse-height distributions in single-crystal NaI(T1) scintillation cameras.

Authors:  S E Strand; I L Lamm
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 10.057

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.